Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive	33.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	14GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 14GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2660 0 1,318 User benchmarks, average bench 63% None, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	51.3% Above average	Memory 66.1 1-Core 53.1 2-Core 98.9 45% 72.7 Pts	4-Core 214 8-Core 208 28% 211 Pts	64-Core 202 12% 202 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 51.3% Great: 71%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Virtual HD 136GB 509 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 114GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.1.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 28 29 28 27 27 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	33.9% Below average	Read 437 Write 29.3 Mixed 216 SusWrite 28.1 38% 178 MB/s	4K Read 17.7 4K Write 11.8 4K Mixed 0 33% 9.83 MB/s	DQ Read 228 DQ Write 43.9 DQ Mixed 4.3 37% 92.2 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 33.9% Great: 78%
Virtual HD 215GB 35 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 197GB free Firmware: 1.1.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 47 46 47 47 47 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	24.7% Poor	Read 190 Write 73 Mixed 154 SusWrite 47.3 26% 116 MB/s	4K Read 11.3 4K Write 16.2 4K Mixed 9.7 38% 12.4 MB/s	DQ Read 61.2 DQ Write 56.4 DQ Mixed 59.1 44% 58.9 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 24.7% Great: 89%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 14GB 9,406 User benchmarks, average bench 35% null MHz 1024, 13312 MB Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	53.8% Above average	MC Read 29.2 MC Write 17.6 MC Mixed 17 61% 21.3 GB/s	SC Read 9.6 SC Write 4.6 SC Mixed 6 19% 6.73 GB/s	Latency 111 36% 111 ns
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 53.8% Great: 52%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	1,322x
SVGA 3DVmwareBench 20%, 11,474 samples	1,139x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	1,040x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	821x
Virtual NVMe Disk 64GBVmwareBench 62%, 2,103 samples	455x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	424x

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $325

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16