Asus H81M-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics34.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive88.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus H81M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150526
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateAug 10 '19 at 18:44
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4690-$52
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
81.9% Excellent
Memory 90.2
1-Core 113
2-Core 220
81% 141 Pts
4-Core 427
8-Core 421
57% 424 Pts
64-Core 423
26% 423 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 81.9%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Zotac(19DA 1375) 2GB
CLim: 1443 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
34.5% Below average
Lighting 44.7
Reflection 43.1
Parallax 38.7
36% 42.2 fps
MRender 39.4
Gravity 39.4
Splatting 35
31% 38 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 34.5%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX100 250GB-$141
152GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 352 334 350 360 360 359 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
88.8% Excellent
Read 453
Write 360
Mixed 302
SusWrite 353
82% 367 MB/s
4K Read 26.2
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 36.1
140% 54.6 MB/s
DQ Read 150
DQ Write 132
DQ Mixed 43
59% 108 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 88.8%
Great: 103%
Seagate Barracuda Green 1TB-$580
143GB free
Firmware: CC32
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 35 32 32 26 29 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
28% Poor
Read 65.5
Write 47.7
Mixed 43.2
SusWrite 32
35% 47.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.5
87% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 28%
Great: 75%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 64GB
60GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.5 9.1 8.7 9.1 8.6 9 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
5.87% Terrible
Read 20.7
Write 8.3
Mixed 8
SusWrite 8.3
13% 11.3 MB/s
4K Read 3.2
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.6
36% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.87%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLT8G3D1608ET3LX0. 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
53.2% Above average
MC Read 18.3
MC Write 19.1
MC Mixed 16.7
52% 18 GB/s
SC Read 14.8
SC Write 18.8
SC Mixed 17.5
49% 17 GB/s
Latency 66.9
60% 66.9 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H81M-PLUS Builds (Compare 2,847 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H81M-PLUS - $98

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $345
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback