Medion E3221 MD61237

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.41% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive36% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemMedion E3221 MD61237  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION YS13G
Memory1.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190627
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 10 '19 at 17:08
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium Silver N5000
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
44% Average
Memory 50
1-Core 56.8
2-Core 113
42% 73.4 Pts
4-Core 219
8-Core 220
29% 220 Pts
64-Core 220
14% 220 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 44%
Great: 44%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 605
Device(1E39 A002) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6519
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
2.41% Terrible
Lighting 3.87
Reflection 4.31
Parallax 3.38
3% 3.85 fps
MRender 0.14
Gravity 3.6
Splatting 0.13
1% 1.29 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.41%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intenso SATAIII 256GB
174GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0817A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 336 135 124 154 55 59 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
36% Below average
Read 396
Write 352
Mixed 334
SusWrite 144
69% 306 MB/s
4K Read 12.4
4K Write 11.2
4K Mixed 1
26% 8.2 MB/s
DQ Read 180
DQ Write 19.5
DQ Mixed 40.6
45% 80.1 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 36%
Great: 98%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
ABCD 123456789012345678 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
29% Poor
MC Read 11.4
MC Write 10
MC Mixed 12.3
32% 11.2 GB/s
SC Read 3
SC Write 4.8
SC Mixed 4.1
11% 3.97 GB/s
Latency 161
25% 161 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 29%
Great: 27%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback