Asrock H110M-HDS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics18.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive108% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock H110M-HDS  (all builds)
Memory4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161019
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 10 '19 at 14:53
Run Duration247 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7400-$110
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
82.1% Excellent
Memory 90.6
1-Core 110
2-Core 216
80% 139 Pts
4-Core 427
8-Core 421
57% 424 Pts
64-Core 416
26% 416 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 82.1%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 560 Ti-$188
MSI(1462 2382) 1GB
CLim: 880 MHz, MLim: 1050 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
18.1% Very poor
Lighting 21.1
Reflection 25
Parallax 19.1
17% 21.7 fps
MRender 28.6
Gravity 21.5
Splatting 23
20% 24.4 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 18.1%
Great: 18%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
132GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 338 227 222 222 217 215 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 456
Write 427
Mixed 356
SusWrite 240
83% 370 MB/s
4K Read 36.6
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 59.9
189% 67.7 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 333
DQ Mixed 354
266% 356 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 108%
Great: 124%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80
497GB free
Firmware: MX6OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 101 100 98 103 102 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
83.9% Excellent
Read 192
Write 178
Mixed 32
SusWrite 101
91% 126 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.6
153% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 83.9%
Great: 107%
Seagate BUP BL 4TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 0109
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 106 109 112 111 112 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
57.9% Above average
Read 91.8
Write 112
Mixed 64.5
SusWrite 109
69% 94.2 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3.7
4K Mixed 0.7
188% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 67%
Seagate BUP Slim WH 2TB
571GB free
Firmware: 0304
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 90 89 89 90 90 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
55.6% Above average
Read 104
Write 79.7
Mixed 63.8
SusWrite 88.5
62% 84.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 4.8
4K Mixed 1
225% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 68%
WD WD10EVVS-63M5B0 1TB
840GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 99 101 100 101 102 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
56.3% Above average
Read 96.4
Write 78.1
Mixed 53.2
SusWrite 99.6
60% 81.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 58%
Seagate BUP Slim WH 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0304
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 86 85 86 87 87 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
46.4% Average
Read 75.1
Write 100
Mixed 80.5
SusWrite 86
63% 85.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.6
144% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 46.4%
Great: 68%
Seagate Backup+ Desktop 4TB
605GB free
Firmware: 1404
SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 165 162 165 168 167 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
73.8% Very good
Read 89.3
Write 120
Mixed 106
SusWrite 165
89% 120 MB/s
4K Read 7.8
4K Write 3.8
4K Mixed 0.5
451% 4.03 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 73.8%
Great: 101%
Seagate Expansion 3TB
1TB free
Firmware: 9300
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 95 93 91 96 100 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
42% Average
Read 50.4
Write 74.2
Mixed 76.4
SusWrite 94.4
55% 73.8 MB/s
4K Read 2.2
4K Write 4
4K Mixed 0.4
210% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 42%
Great: 62%
WD 15EADS External 1.5TB
223GB free, PID 1003
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 39 39 40 40 40 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
18.2% Very poor
Read 39.8
Write 40.8
Mixed 31
SusWrite 39.5
51% 37.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
63% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 18.2%
Great: 21%
HGST 1TB
461GB free, PID 1014
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 39 40 42 41 42 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
19.8% Very poor
Read 41
Write 37.3
Mixed 35.3
SusWrite 40.6
52% 38.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
77% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 19.8%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905678-043.A00G 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
40.6% Average
MC Read 14.8
MC Write 14.5
MC Mixed 10.8
38% 13.4 GB/s
SC Read 11.4
SC Write 14.2
SC Mixed 12.2
36% 12.6 GB/s
Latency 66.4
60% 66.4 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 40.6%
Great: 41%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H110M-HDS Builds (Compare 588 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock H110M-HDS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $200
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback