Asus Z170M-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics58.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive239% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus Z170M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180516
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateAug 10 '19 at 07:50
Run Duration184 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$180
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
81.6% Excellent
Memory 92.6
1-Core 115
2-Core 202
80% 137 Pts
4-Core 381
8-Core 600
60% 490 Pts
64-Core 655
40% 655 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 81.6%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 431.60
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
58.9% Above average
Lighting 73.4
Reflection 73.8
Parallax 63.5
60% 70.2 fps
MRender 69.3
Gravity 69
Splatting 70.7
57% 69.7 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Pcie SSD 1TB
629GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM12.2 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1661 966 973 992 971 973 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
239% Outstanding
Read 1,322
Write 2,119
Mixed 1,521
SusWrite 1,089
343% 1,513 MB/s
4K Read 43.4
4K Write 135
4K Mixed 65.1
221% 81.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,245
DQ Write 1,057
DQ Mixed 1,149
861% 1,150 MB/s
Poor: 112%
This bench: 239%
Great: 284%
Crucial BX200 240GB-$36
22GB free
Firmware: MU01.4
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 482
Write 426
Mixed 375
95% 428 MB/s
4K Read 31.6
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 45.4
161% 60.5 MB/s
DQ Read 288
DQ Write 314
DQ Mixed 234
194% 278 MB/s
Poor: 55% Great: 91%
Seagate ST32000542AS 2TB-$100
1TB free
Firmware: CC35
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 32 29 31 35 29 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
29.3% Poor
Read 71
Write 32.5
Mixed 23.2
SusWrite 31.1
29% 39.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.8
131% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 29.3%
Great: 61%
Seagate ST32000542AS 2TB-$100
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC35
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 68 70 72 71 70 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
47.4% Average
Read 95.5
Write 79
Mixed 49.3
SusWrite 69.5
54% 73.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 47.4%
Great: 61%
WD Green 1.5TB (2009)-$150
463GB free
Firmware: 04.05G04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 77 77 80 78 77 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
43% Average
Read 72.2
Write 75.5
Mixed 56.3
SusWrite 77.2
52% 70.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
136% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 43%
Great: 55%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 8TB
7TB free
Firmware: D781
SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 182 185 188 190 189 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
97.6% Outstanding
Read 152
Write 168
Mixed 106
SusWrite 186
112% 153 MB/s
4K Read 4.8
4K Write 3.8
4K Mixed 0.8
359% 3.13 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 97.6%
Great: 92%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 4x4GB-$115
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2733 MHz
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
90.3% Outstanding
MC Read 33.6
MC Write 35
MC Mixed 28.8
93% 32.5 GB/s
SC Read 18.4
SC Write 33.9
SC Mixed 25.9
74% 26.1 GB/s
Latency 62.8
64% 62.8 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 90.3%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z170M-PLUS Builds (Compare 1,231 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus Z170M-PLUS - $87

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $536
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $124Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback