Dell Latitude E7240

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (93rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 7 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.29% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemDell Latitude E7240  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0PRPKP
Memory13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140501
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 10 '19 at 02:52
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4600U
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
62.6% Good
Memory 90.9
1-Core 97.5
2-Core 158
70% 116 Pts
4-Core 197
8-Core 225
28% 211 Pts
64-Core 240
15% 240 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 62.6%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)
Dell(1028 05CA) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4835
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
3.29% Terrible
Lighting 3.63
Reflection 6.15
Parallax 6.16
3% 5.31 fps
MRender 6.62
Gravity 1.93
Splatting 5.65
4% 4.73 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.29%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM851 mSATA 256GB
198GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT4AD0Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 382
Write 146
Mixed 163
50% 230 MB/s
4K Read 13.6
4K Write 43
4K Mixed 17.3
66% 24.6 MB/s
DQ Read 362
DQ Write 202
DQ Mixed 69.8
109% 211 MB/s
Poor: 43% Great: 83%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB HMT41GS6AFR8A-PB 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
58.3% Above average
MC Read 20.5
MC Write 21.9
MC Mixed 17.8
57% 20.1 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 19.9
51% 17.9 GB/s
Latency 66
61% 66 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Latitude E7240 Builds (Compare 1,239 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Latitude E7240

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $131Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback