Asus X99-A II

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 68%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.9%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics45.6% is a reasonable 3D score (GTX 1070 = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive163% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
MotherboardAsus X99-A II  (all builds)
Memory25.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160628
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 09 '19 at 20:55
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i7-6800K-$349
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
75.9% Very good
1-Core 109
2-Core 219
77% 164 Pts
4-Core 430
8-Core 653
69% 541 Pts
64-Core 804
54% 804 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 75.9%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$500
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 416.94
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (163 fps cap detected)
45.6% Average
Lighting 163
Reflection 163
Parallax 163
42% 163 fps
MRender 163
Gravity 163
Splatting 163
50% 163 fps
Poor: 88%
This bench: 45.6%
Great: 112%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$140
78GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 483 218 236 270 269 265 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
163% Outstanding
Read 1,314
Write 713
Mixed 531
SusWrite 290
157% 712 MB/s
4K Read 38.7
4K Write 132
4K Mixed 49.7
192% 73.6 MB/s
DQ Read 847
DQ Write 698
DQ Mixed 694
541% 746 MB/s
Poor: 159%
This bench: 163%
Great: 259%
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$249
9GB free
Firmware: EXM04B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 4,994
Write 5,178
Mixed 4,968
1,129% 5,047 MB/s
4K Read 439
4K Write 263
4K Mixed 316
1,210% 340 MB/s
DQ Read 1,034
DQ Write 854
DQ Mixed 920
696% 936 MB/s
Poor: 75% Great: 125%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$75
2TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 158 170 190 191 189 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 187
Write 197
Mixed 94.2
SusWrite 175
120% 163 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 1.1
221% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 104%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
HyperX Fury DDR4 2666 C15 4x8GB-$165
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (97th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled
123% Outstanding
MC Read 44.6
MC Write 56.6
MC Mixed 45
139% 48.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.1
SC Write 19.3
SC Mixed 20.3
51% 17.9 GB/s
Latency 63.6
63% 63.6 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 123%
Great: 121%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds (explanation by AdoredTV).

Typical X99-A II Builds (Compare 3,435 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 92%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 64%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus X99-A II - $294

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $1,320
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $219Nvidia GTX 1660 $220Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $86
Intel Core i5-9400F $143Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $270Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $102
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 $196AMD RX 580 $167Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $97
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $75SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $42G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $799SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $75Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback