| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Graphics | 17.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | Fujitsu CELSIUS W280 (all builds) |
| Motherboard | FUJITSU D2912-A1 |
| Memory | 1.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1440 x 900 - 32 Bit kolorów |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20100129 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Aug 09 '19 at 20:19 |
| Run Duration | 114 Seconds |
| Run User | POL-User |
| Background CPU | 16% |
PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5 660
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.35 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
|
48.6%
Average
|
56% 93.8 Pts
|
22% 167 Pts
|
12% 186 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
Gigabyte(1458 3681) 2GB
CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 431.60
|
17.7%
Very poor
|
18% 19.6 fps
|
17% 21.5 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Hitachi HDT721025SLA380 250GB-$105
56GB free (System drive)
Firmware: STBOA3AA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 25 18 31 41 45 MB/s
|
15.1%
Very poor
|
19% 26.6 MB/s
|
26% 0.27 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nanya NT2GC64B8HC0NF-CG 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (40th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
29.7%
Poor
|
29% 10.3 GB/s
|
21% 7.37 GB/s
|
40% 101 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical CELSIUS W280 Builds (Compare 33 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Fujitsu CELSIUS W280
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples | 21x |
| Core i7 860Intel $339Bench 64%, 51,451 samples | 9x |
| Core i5 650Intel $70Bench 46%, 42,063 samples | 1x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| FirePro 3800 (FireGL) Graphics AdapterATIBench 4%, 464 samples | 5x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 4x |
| GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 2x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 72% - Very good | Total price: $129 |