Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1630 v3 1,907 User benchmarks, average bench 75% CPU0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	84.1% Excellent	Memory 91.6 1-Core 114 2-Core 200 79% 135 Pts	4-Core 413 8-Core 605 64% 509 Pts	64-Core 601 37% 601 Pts
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 84.1% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia NVS 510 2,450 User benchmarks, average bench 3% HP(103C 0967) 2GB CLim: 797 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 419.72 Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 3% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Samsung MZHPV512HDGL-000H1 512GB 35 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 394GB free (System drive) Firmware: BXW24H0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 1421 1468 1461 1466 1484 1483 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 48% Great: 102%
Intel Raid 5 Volume 11.5TB 67 User benchmarks, average bench 129% 10TB free Firmware: 1.0. SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 28 21 16 27 28 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	133% Outstanding	Read 436 Write 26.6 Mixed 44.2 SusWrite 24.9 96% 133 MB/s	4K Read 12 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 2.2 776% 5.3 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 133% Great: 247%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393A2G40EB1-CPB 4x16GB 199 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 4 of 8 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	96.3% Outstanding	MC Read 31.7 MC Write 42.8 MC Mixed 35 104% 36.5 GB/s	SC Read 16 SC Write 21.5 SC Mixed 22.1 57% 19.9 GB/s	Latency 64.7 62% 64.7 ns
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 96.3% Great: 125%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 18%

Surfboard

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 16%

Surfboard

GPU
Quadro K2200Nvidia $440Bench 16%, 13,860 samples	739x
Quadro M4000NvidiaBench 32%, 9,043 samples	374x
Quadro K4200Nvidia $820Bench 21%, 7,330 samples	223x

SSD
SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 238%, 21,542 samples	143x
SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBSamsungBench 219%, 21,747 samples	129x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	122x

RAM
M393A1G40DB0-CPB 2x8GBSamsungBench 60%, 1,030 samples	182x
M393A1G40DB0-CPB 4x8GBSamsungBench 93%, 970 samples	177x
M393A2G40DB0-CPB 2x16GBSamsungBench 59%, 1,132 samples	157x

Value: 9% - Terrible

Total price: $440

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16