Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics50.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive28.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus M5A99X EVO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory14 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140403
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 09 '19 at 09:24
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8320-$129
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
66.4% Good
Memory 87.9
1-Core 69.1
2-Core 122
59% 93 Pts
4-Core 245
8-Core 358
38% 302 Pts
64-Core 356
22% 356 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 66.4%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 290-$399
AMD(1002 0B00) ≥ 4GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 25.20.15031.9002
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
50.6% Above average
Lighting 62
Reflection 56.2
Parallax 74
51% 64.1 fps
MRender 56.1
Gravity 53.6
Splatting 71.3
51% 60.3 fps
Poor: 41%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 50%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata Ultimate SU800 512GB-$84
382GB free
Firmware: Q1204A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 378 397 395 397 397 393 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
93% Outstanding
Read 440
Write 346
Mixed 384
SusWrite 393
88% 390 MB/s
4K Read 32.5
4K Write 57.8
4K Mixed 39.7
131% 43.3 MB/s
DQ Read 253
DQ Write 223
DQ Mixed 133
129% 203 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 93%
Great: 127%
Sandisk S128G 126GB
33GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 89 24 21 23 26 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
28.9% Poor
Read 328
Write 176
Mixed 31.5
SusWrite 53.3
32% 147 MB/s
4K Read 13.5
4K Write 11.3
4K Mixed 9.1
38% 11.3 MB/s
DQ Read 31
DQ Write 13
DQ Mixed 14.5
13% 19.5 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 28.9%
Great: 56%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
253GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 58 56 70 95 103 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
37.3% Below average
Read 56.2
Write 23.5
Mixed 19
SusWrite 74
31% 43.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.2
34% 0.23 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 37.3%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX KHX1866C10D3/4G KHX1600C9D3/4GX KHX1866C10D3/4G 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
42.4% Average
MC Read 18.3
MC Write 14.2
MC Mixed 13.3
44% 15.3 GB/s
SC Read 6.1
SC Write 9
SC Mixed 8.1
22% 7.73 GB/s
Latency 69.7
57% 69.7 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 42.4%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99X EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 753 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0 - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $729
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback