Positivo MOBILE

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Graphics0.34% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive17.3% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemPositivo MOBILE  (all builds)
MotherboardPOSITIVO H24ZC
Memory1.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20101026
Uptime12.2 Days
Run DateAug 09 '19 at 02:30
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron 925
Socket 478, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 18.2
2-Core 17.4
9% 17.8 Pts
4-Core 22.9
8-Core 27.3
3% 25.1 Pts
64-Core 22.4
1% 22.4 Pts
Poor: 14% Great: 37%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Mobile Series 4 Express Chipset Family
Device(1B0A 2009)
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2702
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.34% Terrible
Lighting 0.4
Reflection 0.35
Parallax 0.41
0% 0.38 fps
MRender 0.43
Gravity 0.4
Splatting 0.52
0% 0.45 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.34%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
369GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 108 145 156 155 66 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
17.3% Very poor
Read 79.3
Write 73.1
Mixed 76.2
SusWrite 126
20% 88.7 MB/s
4K Read 6
4K Write 6.8
4K Mixed 6.2
21% 6.33 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 17.3%
Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR2
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
6.7% Terrible
MC Read 3.5
MC Write 1.7
MC Mixed 2.3
7% 2.5 GB/s
SC Read 0.8
SC Write 1.7
SC Mixed 1.9
4% 1.47 GB/s
Latency 800
5% 800 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 6.7%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MOBILE Builds (Compare 138 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Positivo MOBILE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $188
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback