Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 27% Raft	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 25.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.61% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	30.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N3060 20,242 User benchmarks, average bench 18% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	25.4% Poor	Memory 43.1 1-Core 24.1 2-Core 47.5 25% 38.2 Pts	4-Core 47.4 8-Core 43.9 6% 45.7 Pts	64-Core 43.9 3% 43.9 Pts
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 25.4% Great: 28%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 60,712 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Dell(1028 06AC) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4549 Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	1.61% Terrible	Lighting 1.7 Reflection 2.46 Parallax 2.34 1% 2.17 fps	MRender 2.52 Gravity 1.7 Splatting 3.09 2% 2.44 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.61% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$35 156,194 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 163GB free (System drive) Firmware: UF300000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 7.6 98 99 126 136 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	30.3% Below average	Read 340 Write 39.4 Mixed 72.7 SusWrite 84 29% 134 MB/s	4K Read 10.4 4K Write 6.4 4K Mixed 13.1 36% 9.97 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 30.3% Great: 55%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT102464BF160B.C16 1x8GB 5,265 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 1 of 1 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1066 MHz Performing below potential (11^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	15% Very poor	MC Read 3.9 MC Write 6.5 MC Mixed 5.7 15% 5.37 GB/s	SC Read 2 SC Write 3.1 SC Mixed 3.4 8% 2.83 GB/s	Latency 188 21% 188 ns
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 15% Great: 33%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 26%

Raft

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Pentium N3710IntelBench 25%, 12,685 samples	172x
Celeron N3060IntelBench 18%, 20,242 samples	157x
Pentium N3700IntelBench 26%, 11,299 samples	67x

GPU
HD GraphicsIntelBench 1%, 60,712 samples	447x

RAM
KNWMX1-ETB 1x4GBUnknownBench 17%, 1,279 samples	155x
HMT451S6BFR8A-PB 1x4GBHynixBench 25%, 64,960 samples	42x
AO1L16BC4R1-BSDS 1x4GBAdataBench 17%, 148 samples	31x

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16