Asus TUF Z370-PRO GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 62% Destroyer	Desktop 101% UFO	Workstation 58% Gunboat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 106%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	57.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	109% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus TUF Z370-PRO GAMING (all builds)
Memory	25.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20171221
Uptime	2 Days
Run Date	Aug 08 '19 at 19:24
Run Duration	198 Seconds
Run User	IND-User
Background CPU	10%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8700K-$186 746,287 User benchmarks, average bench 88% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.85 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	106% Outstanding	Memory 94.7 1-Core 158 2-Core 314 103% 189 Pts	4-Core 627 8-Core 1018 101% 822 Pts	64-Core 1,282 79% 1,282 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 100%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Zotac(19DA 1438) CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 417.35 Performing below potential (73^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	57.5% Above average	Lighting 70.9 Reflection 75.3 Parallax 62.1 58% 69.5 fps	MRender 68.8 Gravity 68.9 Splatting 70.3 57% 69.3 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 57.5% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52 296,814 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 128GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 293 284 291 293 292 289 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	109% Outstanding	Read 484 Write 464 Mixed 438 SusWrite 290 94% 419 MB/s	4K Read 47.3 4K Write 112 4K Mixed 44.8 188% 68 MB/s	DQ Read 381 DQ Write 297 DQ Mixed 226 200% 301 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 109% Great: 128%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 499GB free Firmware: 02.01A02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 153 153 154 155 153 MB/s Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	94.9% Outstanding	Read 177 Write 166 Mixed 97.7 SusWrite 153 109% 149 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1.1 218% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 94.9% Great: 109%
TO Exter nal USB 3.0 500GB 1,723 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 461GB free Firmware: 0204 SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 104 106 105 106 106 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	59.2% Above average	Read 102 Write 76.8 Mixed 53.3 SusWrite 104 62% 84.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 0.8 156% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 59.2% Great: 68%
Seagate Expansion Desk 2TB 12,762 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 2TB free Firmware: 0711 SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 115 119 157 168 132 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	82.3% Excellent	Read 140 Write 140 Mixed 40.5 SusWrite 145 84% 116 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 7.7 4K Mixed 0.7 250% 3.03 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 82.3% Great: 104%
Samsung M3 Portable 2TB 5,095 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 1TB free, PID 61b5 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 104 104 103 103 104 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	52.2% Above average	Read 103 Write 78.7 Mixed 62.2 SusWrite 103 115% 86.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 4.8 4K Mixed 1.1 203% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 52.2% Great: 52%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 32GB 34,316 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 4GB free, PID 5567 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.4 3.3 5.5 5.4 5.9 5.9 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	7.29% Terrible	Read 21 Write 8 Mixed 5.5 SusWrite 4.5 11% 9.75 MB/s	4K Read 3.4 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 1.4 87% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 7.29% Great: 18%
Mass Storage Device 320GB 2,915 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 64GB free, PID 6116 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 41 41 41 41 41 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	19.6% Very poor	Read 40.3 Write 40.7 Mixed 24 SusWrite 41.2 49% 36.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.6 73% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 19.6% Great: 20%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x16GB 3,988 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	49% Average	MC Read 17.2 MC Write 16.6 MC Mixed 13.7 45% 15.8 GB/s	SC Read 15.8 SC Write 17.7 SC Mixed 17.5 49% 17 GB/s	Latency 58 69% 58 ns
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 49% Great: 105%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF Z370-PRO GAMING Builds (Compare 1,621 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 93%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 91%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 85%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z370-PRO GAMING

CPU
Core i7-8700KIntel $186Bench 88%, 746,287 samples	676x
Core i5-8600KIntel $173Bench 91%, 264,837 samples	302x
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	196x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	146x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	144x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	132x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	79x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	63x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	50x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	84x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	35x
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	30x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 73% - Very good

Total price: $709

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16