| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including moderate gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 15.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 10 years and 4 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
Run History
4 months ago, 4 months ago.
| Motherboard | Asus P8H61-M PLUS V3 (all builds) |
| Memory | 5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20120810 |
| Uptime | 0.5 Days |
| Run Date | Aug 08 '19 at 16:41 |
| Run Duration | 104 Seconds |
| Run User | EGY-User |
| Background CPU | 42% |
PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Extreme |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
41.2%
Average
|
51% 107 Pts
|
26% 188 Pts
|
12% 184 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GT 1030
Asus(1043 85F5) 2GB
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 431.60
|
15.1%
Very poor
|
15% 51.6 fps
|
15% 46.1 fps
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston 99P5471-024.A00LF 99P5471-011.A00LF 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
|
52.2%
Above average
|
51% 18 GB/s
|
42% 14.8 GB/s
|
62% 64.4 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.
Typical P8H61-M PLUS V3 Builds (Compare 139 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus P8H61-M PLUS V3
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-3470Intel $96Bench 61%, 105,516 samples | 38x |
| Core i3-3220Intel $64Bench 45%, 36,623 samples | 23x |
| Core i5-3330IntelBench 53%, 27,043 samples | 11x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 74,674 samples | 19x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $155Bench 31%, 463,263 samples | 10x |
| GTX 1050Nvidia $120Bench 28%, 132,041 samples | 9x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 69% - Good | Total price: $118 |