Oegstone DH55TC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics15.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
SystemOegstone DH55TC  (all builds)
MotherboardIntel DH55TC
Memory13.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20091201
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateAug 08 '19 at 05:41
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i5 760-$199
XU1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
62.6% Good
Memory 82.8
1-Core 69.1
2-Core 120
58% 90.6 Pts
4-Core 245
8-Core 258
34% 252 Pts
64-Core 248
17% 248 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 62.6%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
Asus(1043 85F5) 2GB
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 430.86
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
15.4% Very poor
Lighting 19.7
Reflection 15.4
Parallax 18.8
16% 18 fps
MRender 16.5
Gravity 19.2
Splatting 20.9
10% 18.9 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 15.4%
Great: 16%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Hitachi HUA721010KLA330 1TB
905GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GKAOAB5A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 17 39 64 70 64 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
22.2% Poor
Read 31.2
Write 30.2
Mixed 18.3
SusWrite 46
23% 31.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.2
47% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 22.2%
Great: 47%
SanDisk Cruzer Glide 3.0 16GB
10GB free, PID 5597
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.2 10 11 11 11 11 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
10.8% Very poor
Read 30.4
Write 10.8
Mixed 14.3
SusWrite 10.2
19% 16.4 MB/s
4K Read 3.4
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 1.6
104% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 10.8%
Great: 28%
SanDisk USB Flash Drive 16GB
14GB free, PID 557e
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.8 5.7 6.9 5.7 6.8 7 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
8.54% Terrible
Read 19.6
Write 8.4
Mixed 13.7
SusWrite 6.3
15% 12 MB/s
4K Read 2.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 1.2
92% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 8.54%
Great: 11%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
37.3% Below average
MC Read 14.9
MC Write 12.2
MC Mixed 12.3
38% 13.1 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 7.9
23% 7.97 GB/s
Latency 75.6
53% 75.6 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 37.3%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical DH55TC Builds (Compare 54 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Oegstone DH55TC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $207
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $190Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $34
Intel Core i5-9400F $143Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i5-10600K $260Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $190Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $71SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $69SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback