Asus SABERTOOTH 990FX R2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus SABERTOOTH 990FX R2.0 (all builds)
Memory	8.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120611
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Aug 08 '19 at 02:07
Run Duration	233 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	10%

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T-$240 23,506 User benchmarks, average bench 57% AM3r2, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	60.6% Good	Memory 82.2 1-Core 54.6 2-Core 110 52% 82.3 Pts	4-Core 214 8-Core 301 32% 258 Pts	64-Core 294 18% 294 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 60.6% Great: 64%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata Ultimate SU800 512GB-$82 31,280 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 295GB free Firmware: R0918B SusWrite @10s intervals: 258 233 203 204 202 210 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	74.3% Very good	Read 302 Write 272 Mixed 253 SusWrite 218 59% 261 MB/s	4K Read 29.3 4K Write 63.9 4K Mixed 40.3 130% 44.5 MB/s	DQ Read 206 DQ Write 162 DQ Mixed 97.3 96% 155 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 74.3% Great: 127%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24 496,077 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 192GB free (System drive) Firmware: 15.01H15 SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 44 65 62 63 63 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	37.9% Below average	Read 77.8 Write 68.3 Mixed 51.5 SusWrite 53.9 46% 62.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.8 140% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 37.9% Great: 69%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA362 500GB-$59 47,815 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 442GB free Firmware: JP2O SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.9 9.5 9.5 9.1 8.6 8.4 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	19.7% Very poor	Read 60.2 Write 6 Mixed 6.8 SusWrite 8.8 15% 20.5 MB/s	4K Read 0 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 0% 0 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 19.7% Great: 74%
Hitachi HTS545050A7E380 500GB 64,410 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 148GB free Firmware: GG2O SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 42 40 43 45 33 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	36.1% Below average	Read 82.8 Write 51.8 Mixed 29 SusWrite 42.9 38% 51.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.5 95% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 36.1% Great: 58%
Disk drive 4GB 12 User benchmarks, average bench 4% 4GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.1 3.6 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.7 MB/s Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	4.93% Terrible	Read 8.2 Write 5.8 Mixed 5.5 SusWrite 3.6 7% 5.78 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.6 54% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.93% Great: 5%
SanDisk USB Flash Drive 16GB 446 User benchmarks, average bench 8% 2GB free, PID 557e Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.5 6.6 6.1 6.5 6.9 6.1 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	8.86% Terrible	Read 22 Write 12.5 Mixed 14 SusWrite 6.4 17% 13.7 MB/s	4K Read 5.1 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 2.4 134% 2.83 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 8.86% Great: 11%
WD 3200BMV External 320GB 822 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 98GB free, PID 0704 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.1 5.1 5.2 5.2 5.2 5.2 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	7.79% Terrible	Read 36.8 Write 4.8 Mixed 8.5 SusWrite 5.1 14% 13.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.4 29% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 7.79% Great: 20%
Staples Relay UFD 2GB 56 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 1GB free, PID 5202 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.8 6.1 6 6 6 6.2 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	5.51% Terrible	Read 19.7 Write 5 Mixed 9 SusWrite 6 11% 9.93 MB/s	4K Read 5.7 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 21% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 5.51% Great: 11%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 500GB 1,344 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 33GB free, PID 0200 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 29 29 29 29 29 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	14% Very poor	Read 29 Write 28 Mixed 20.2 SusWrite 28.9 36% 26.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.4 52% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 14% Great: 45%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 16GB 70,565 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1066, 1066 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing below potential (22^nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	31.5% Below average	MC Read 13.1 MC Write 6.8 MC Mixed 12.2 31% 10.7 GB/s	SC Read 6.6 SC Write 6.6 SC Mixed 8.9 21% 7.37 GB/s	Latency 76.6 52% 76.6 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 31.5% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical SABERTOOTH 990FX R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,672 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 34%

Sail boat

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 28%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus SABERTOOTH 990FX R2.0 - $200

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	863x
FX-9590AMD $298Bench 63%, 26,109 samples	209x
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	146x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	110x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	83x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	81x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	62x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	61x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	59x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	84x
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 4x8GBKingstonBench 63%, 12,722 samples	45x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	28x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 53% - Above average

Total price: $630

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16