Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 48% Yacht	Desktop 82% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 45% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	54.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING
Motherboard	Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING (all builds)
Memory	13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190125
Uptime	0.4 Days
Run Date	Aug 07 '19 at 22:39
Run Duration	181 Seconds
Run User	BLZ-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$155 179,588 User benchmarks, average bench 73% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	83.5% Excellent	Memory 80.4 1-Core 119 2-Core 234 80% 145 Pts	4-Core 465 8-Core 751 75% 608 Pts	64-Core 937 58% 937 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 83.5% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130 360,351 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Gigabyte(1458 22F9) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1340 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.1.1 Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	54.2% Above average	Lighting 68.8 Reflection 68.8 Parallax 85.8 56% 74.5 fps	MRender 67 Gravity 65.9 Splatting 55.1 50% 62.6 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 54.2% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Toshiba MQ01ABD075 750GB-$40 42,694 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 338GB free (System drive) Firmware: AX0A4M SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 66 74 70 70 70 MB/s Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	47.5% Average	Read 95.3 Write 97.1 Mixed 32.9 SusWrite 70.3 54% 73.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.6 109% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 47.5% Great: 57%
Hitachi HTS543216L9SA00 160GB 1,536 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 149GB free Firmware: FB2OC43C SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 61 48 62 63 63 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	34.5% Below average	Read 60.5 Write 60.3 Mixed 33.6 SusWrite 59.7 39% 53.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.7 117% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 34.5% Great: 34%
Generic Flash-Disk 8GB 130 User benchmarks, average bench 8% 7GB free, PID 1320 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.7 5.1 3.7 4.6 4.6 4.6 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	4.23% Terrible	Read 19.8 Write 6.8 Mixed 9.1 SusWrite 4.7 12% 10.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0.1 7% 0.1 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 4.23% Great: 18%
Seagate Portable 500GB 3,247 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 202GB free, PID 2300 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 29 29 28 29 29 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	14.4% Very poor	Read 36.1 Write 29.3 Mixed 24.6 SusWrite 28.8 39% 29.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.7 56% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 14.4% Great: 19%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 32GB 34,316 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 26GB free, PID 5567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.4 3.5 4.4 6.3 4.9 5.2 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	5.34% Terrible	Read 15.6 Write 7.5 Mixed 4.2 SusWrite 4.6 9% 7.97 MB/s	4K Read 4.9 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 1 62% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 5.34% Great: 18%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-2666 2x8GB 17,908 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	90.3% Outstanding	MC Read 34.7 MC Write 33.3 MC Mixed 30.2 94% 32.7 GB/s	SC Read 22.6 SC Write 32.6 SC Mixed 25.6 77% 26.9 GB/s	Latency 79.8 50% 79.8 ns
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 90.3% Great: 95%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING-CF Builds (Compare 4,627 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 82%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 81%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 80%

Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING - $140

CPU
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	1,405x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $155Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	540x
Ryzen 5 2600XAMD $120Bench 74%, 142,983 samples	533x

GPU
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	318x
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	227x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	207x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	174x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	171x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	135x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	245x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	183x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	156x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 95% - Outstanding

Total price: $673

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16