Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 58% Gunboat	Desktop 66% Battle cruiser	Workstation 63% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	84.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	20.6% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING
Motherboard	Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING (all builds)
Memory	9.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190506
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Aug 07 '19 at 22:31
Run Duration	169 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	42%

Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$210 159,077 User benchmarks, average bench 76% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	63.1% Good	Memory 71.5 1-Core 61.5 2-Core 123 52% 85.3 Pts	4-Core 292 8-Core 725 58% 509 Pts	64-Core 1,238 77% 1,238 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 63.1% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$324 645,160 User benchmarks, average bench 90% MSI(1462 3755) CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 431.60 Performing below potential (17^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	84.8% Excellent	Lighting 105 Reflection 112 Parallax 103 86% 106 fps	MRender 134 Gravity 99.9 Splatting 80.9 83% 105 fps
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 84.8% Great: 97%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Intel SSDSCKKW512G8 512GB 674 User benchmarks, average bench 107% 291GB free (System drive) Firmware: LHF002C SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 168 166 163 167 158 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	20.6% Poor	Read 203 Write 185 Mixed 181 SusWrite 164 41% 183 MB/s	4K Read 2.5 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 2.3 8% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 20.6% Great: 128%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$33 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 88GB free Firmware: CC45 SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 104 106 106 106 104 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	74.9% Very good	Read 156 Write 131 Mixed 83.5 SusWrite 105 87% 119 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 1 172% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 74.9% Great: 112%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70 337,642 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 107GB free Firmware: JC45 SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 77 74 77 78 78 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	46% Average	Read 83.5 Write 81.7 Mixed 59.7 SusWrite 76.7 56% 75.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.9 154% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 46% Great: 68%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$65 103,919 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 912GB free Firmware: 01.00A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 103 105 105 105 104 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	59.6% Above average	Read 103 Write 96.5 Mixed 55.7 SusWrite 104 66% 89.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.8 153% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 59.6% Great: 57%
ASMT 2115 160GB 268 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 4GB free, PID 1153 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 19 19 20 21 18 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	9.76% Terrible	Read 22.7 Write 20.7 Mixed 15.2 SusWrite 19.5 26% 19.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.4 38% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 9.76% Great: 35%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2933 C15 2x8GB 6,535 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	79.3% Very good	MC Read 32 MC Write 28.6 MC Mixed 28.3 85% 29.6 GB/s	SC Read 16.2 SC Write 23.4 SC Mixed 19.9 57% 19.8 GB/s	Latency 97.8 41% 97.8 ns
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 79.3% Great: 103%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING-CF Builds (Compare 4,620 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 82%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 81%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 80%

Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING - $140

CPU
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	1,402x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $125Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	539x
Ryzen 5 2600XAMD $120Bench 74%, 142,983 samples	532x

GPU
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	318x
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	226x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	206x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	174x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	170x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	134x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	244x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $37Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	183x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	156x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 95% - Outstanding

Total price: $673

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16