Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (98th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 2 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	3.98% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4710MQ-$50 15,557 User benchmarks, average bench 60% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	74% Very good	Memory 81.3 1-Core 103 2-Core 197 73% 127 Pts	4-Core 360 8-Core 523 55% 442 Pts	64-Core 515 32% 515 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 74% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? HP(103C 2255) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4835 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	3.98% Terrible	Lighting 3.93 Reflection 16.8 Parallax 6.81 3% 9.2 fps	MRender 9.52 Gravity 2.37 Splatting 7.91 6% 6.6 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.98% Great: 3%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk SD6PP4M-256G-1006 256GB 1,500 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 19GB free (System drive) Firmware: A200806 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 600 Write 391 Mixed 172 85% 388 MB/s	4K Read 24.2 4K Write 55.8 4K Mixed 26.5 100% 35.5 MB/s	DQ Read 19.3 DQ Write 59.7 DQ Mixed 21.7 22% 33.6 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 103%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 8KTF51264HZ-1G6N1 8KTF51264HZ-1G6N1 Samsung M471B1G73QH0-YK0 16GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096, 8192 MB Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	53.2% Above average	MC Read 19.6 MC Write 19.6 MC Mixed 15.7 52% 18.3 GB/s	SC Read 14.3 SC Write 19.3 SC Mixed 17.7 49% 17.1 GB/s	Latency 78.1 51% 78.1 ns
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 53.2% Great: 53%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 12%

Tree trunk

Desktop 64%

Destroyer

Workstation 11%

Tree trunk

GPU
Quadro K3100MNvidiaBench 11%, 2,978 samples	144x
HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 258,091 samples	55x
Quadro K5100MNvidiaBench 21%, 641 samples	31x

SSD
SD7SB2Q-512G-1006 512GBSandiskBench 83%, 1,918 samples	16x
SD6PP4M-256G-1006 256GBSandiskBench 81%, 1,500 samples	12x
SD7TB3Q-256G-1006 256GBSandiskBench 81%, 3,659 samples	11x

RAM
HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB 2x8GBHynixBench 52%, 34,976 samples	26x
HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB 4x8GBHynixBench 54%, 1,944 samples	21x
M471B1G73EB0-YK0 2x8GBSamsungBench 52%, 10,651 samples	13x

Value: 56% - Above average

Total price: $400

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16