Asus TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 109%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 108%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics32.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive307% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory26.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farver
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190124
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateAug 06 '19 at 14:18
Run Duration237 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU 11%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700KF-$280
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Memory 94.5
1-Core 162
2-Core 325
105% 194 Pts
4-Core 650
8-Core 1,197
110% 923 Pts
64-Core 1,247
77% 1,247 Pts
Poor: 84%
This bench: 108%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 85CD) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
32.7% Below average
Lighting 41
Reflection 31.8
Parallax 38.4
33% 37.1 fps
MRender 38.9
Gravity 40
Splatting 36.7
31% 38.6 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 32.7%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
402GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1944 823 608 608 607 607 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
307% Outstanding
Read 2,325
Write 2,099
Mixed 1,443
SusWrite 866
376% 1,683 MB/s
4K Read 67.2
4K Write 148
4K Mixed 91.1
297% 102 MB/s
DQ Read 1,707
DQ Write 1,362
DQ Mixed 1547
1,154% 1,539 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 307%
Great: 340%
Intel 520 Series 240GB-$139
173GB free
Firmware: 400i
SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 167 168 166 158 117 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
59.3% Above average
Read 423
Write 136
Mixed 185
SusWrite 157
50% 225 MB/s
4K Read 33.5
4K Write 19.7
4K Mixed 22.4
90% 25.2 MB/s
DQ Read 179
DQ Write 68.9
DQ Mixed 92.8
77% 114 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 59.3%
Great: 95%
Intel Raid 1 Volume 4TB
2TB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 155 157 157 158 158 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
88% Excellent
Read 152
Write 143
Mixed 46
SusWrite 155
90% 124 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 1
172% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 88%
Great: 134%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 2TB-$50
1TB free
Firmware: CC44
SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 189 189 189 188 187 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
83.2% Excellent
Read 102
Write 139
Mixed 29.5
SusWrite 187
83% 114 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 2
368% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 83.2%
Great: 108%
UFD 2.0 Silicon-Power16G 16GB
15GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.3 6.9 7.3 6.7 7.6 6.6 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
5.89% Terrible
Read 20
Write 5.2
Mixed 5.8
SusWrite 6.9
10% 9.48 MB/s
4K Read 6.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
23% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.89%
Great: 11%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x16GB-$74
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
91% Outstanding
MC Read 33.8
MC Write 34.9
MC Mixed 28.1
92% 32.3 GB/s
SC Read 19.9
SC Write 35.8
SC Mixed 26.9
79% 27.5 GB/s
Latency 58.4
68% 58.4 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 91%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 3,287 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 114%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 115% - Outstanding Total price: $552
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback