Asus M5A97 R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics52.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive92% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus M5A97 R2.0  (all builds)
Memory9.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150626
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateAug 05 '19 at 19:52
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU 13%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8300-$168
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.25 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
68.7% Good
Memory 93.1
1-Core 74.9
2-Core 147
65% 105 Pts
4-Core 241
8-Core 424
40% 333 Pts
64-Core 425
26% 425 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 68.7%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1360 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.5.2
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
52.8% Above average
Lighting 65.6
Reflection 69.5
Parallax 82
53% 72.4 fps
MRender 69.4
Gravity 66.4
Splatting 56.3
52% 64 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 52.8%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
95GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 352 229 225 227 247 235 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
92% Outstanding
Read 477
Write 442
Mixed 357
SusWrite 253
86% 382 MB/s
4K Read 34.8
4K Write 68
4K Mixed 44.8
146% 49.2 MB/s
DQ Read 282
DQ Write 246
DQ Mixed 261
196% 263 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 92%
Great: 124%
WD Green 480GB (2018)-$69
162GB free
Firmware: UG450000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 309 20 172 82 196 189 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
50.7% Above average
Read 432
Write 351
Mixed 303
SusWrite 161
70% 312 MB/s
4K Read 15.5
4K Write 28.6
4K Mixed 18
62% 20.7 MB/s
DQ Read 118
DQ Write 79.6
DQ Mixed 42.3
47% 80 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 60%
WD Black 640GB (2008)-$25
217GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 74 76 76 76 80 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
50.2% Above average
Read 99
Write 88.3
Mixed 63.8
SusWrite 75.8
60% 81.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
177% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 65%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$51
367GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 150 147 147 146 151 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
79.7% Very good
Read 129
Write 122
Mixed 74
SusWrite 148
87% 118 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 79.7%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1866 MHz clocked @ 933 MHz
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
53.1% Above average
MC Read 22.3
MC Write 16.1
MC Mixed 18.8
54% 19.1 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 8.8
SC Mixed 13.3
32% 11.1 GB/s
Latency 61.9
65% 61.9 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 53.1%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A97 R2.0 Builds (Compare 2,815 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 R2.0 - $89

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $358
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback