Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results


Gaming 133% UFO	Desktop 103% UFO	Workstation 148% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	133% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	302% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) (all builds)
Memory	27.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190708
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Aug 05 '19 at 18:28
Run Duration	270 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$395 197,342 User benchmarks, average bench 88% AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	98.7% Outstanding	Memory 88 1-Core 148 2-Core 296 96% 177 Pts	4-Core 585 8-Core 1,159 103% 872 Pts	64-Core 2,092 130% 2,092 Pts
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 98.7% Great: 97%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% EVGA(3842 6696) CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 431.60 Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	133% Outstanding	Lighting 188 Reflection 195 Parallax 192 153% 191 fps	MRender 124 Gravity 183 Splatting 128 118% 145 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 133% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 367,854 User benchmarks, average bench 276% 403GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1800 1078 822 823 824 822 MB/s Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	302% Outstanding	Read 2,522 Write 1,946 Mixed 1,762 SusWrite 1028 405% 1,814 MB/s	4K Read 67.9 4K Write 152 4K Mixed 91.4 301% 104 MB/s	DQ Read 1,186 DQ Write 834 DQ Mixed 975 738% 998 MB/s
Poor: 178% ↑ This bench: 302% Great: 355%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 25GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 493 Write 447 Mixed 396 99% 445 MB/s	4K Read 43.5 4K Write 93.4 4K Mixed 57.4 189% 64.8 MB/s	DQ Read 219 DQ Write 185 DQ Mixed 200 150% 201 MB/s
Poor: 80% Great: 134%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 85GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 453 399 357 155 157 159 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	105% Outstanding	Read 494 Write 399 Mixed 397 SusWrite 280 88% 393 MB/s	4K Read 43.5 4K Write 92.8 4K Mixed 57.3 188% 64.5 MB/s	DQ Read 219 DQ Write 185 DQ Mixed 200 150% 201 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 134%
Crucial M4 128GB-$116 34,516 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 4GB free Firmware: 0309 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 454 Write 187 Mixed 228 64% 290 MB/s	4K Read 21.5 4K Write 37.7 4K Mixed 16.8 74% 25.3 MB/s	DQ Read 135 DQ Write 116 DQ Mixed 57.8 62% 103 MB/s
Poor: 44% Great: 72%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 4TB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 118 122 123 122 123 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	68.9% Good	Read 118 Write 90.5 Mixed 97.8 SusWrite 121 79% 107 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 0.7 157% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 68.9% Great: 67%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 595GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 170 173 173 172 172 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	109% Outstanding	Read 206 Write 152 Mixed 94 SusWrite 172 114% 156 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 1.2 239% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 109% Great: 109%
SAMSUNG HD154UI 1.5TB 203 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 1TB free, PID 0475 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 40 40 40 40 40 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	19.5% Very poor	Read 37.5 Write 39.5 Mixed 35.7 SusWrite 39.9 52% 38.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.7 84% 1 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 19.5% Great: 20%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 2x16GB 4,021 User benchmarks, average bench 98% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	118% Outstanding	MC Read 46.4 MC Write 42.3 MC Mixed 43.7 126% 44.1 GB/s	SC Read 26.9 SC Write 23.9 SC Mixed 39.5 86% 30.1 GB/s	Latency 69.5 58% 69.5 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 118% Great: 136%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 25,763 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 129%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 130%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $193

CPU
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	4,634x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $185Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	4,257x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $153Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	3,408x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	2,231x
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	2,071x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	1,465x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $76Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	1,834x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $98Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	1,104x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	863x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	769x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $63Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	724x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $114Bench 89%, 144,399 samples	645x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 100% - Outstanding

Total price: $914

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16