Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING II

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics8.88% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive106% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING II  (all builds)
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180831
Uptime5.9 Days
Run DateAug 05 '19 at 12:34
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400F-$102
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
83.5% Excellent
Memory 90.2
1-Core 104
2-Core 208
77% 134 Pts
4-Core 414
8-Core 612
64% 513 Pts
64-Core 586
36% 586 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 83.5%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 550-Ti-$250
Gigabyte(1458 3536) 1GB
CLim: 900 MHz, MLim: 1025 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
8.88% Terrible
Lighting 9.77
Reflection 11.9
Parallax 4.03
8% 8.57 fps
MRender 14.8
Gravity 10
Splatting 14
11% 12.9 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 8.88%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A1000 NVMe PCIe M.2 240GB-$53
89GB free (System drive)
Firmware: E8FK11.R Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 486 225 217 343 237 219 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 746
Write 817
Mixed 675
SusWrite 288
142% 632 MB/s
4K Read 35.4
4K Write 97.2
4K Mixed 31.2
145% 54.6 MB/s
DQ Read 429
DQ Write 265
DQ Mixed 301
236% 332 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 106%
Great: 141%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
139GB free
Firmware: CC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 191 193 188 190 191 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 55% Great: 112%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80
2TB free
Firmware: MX6OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 181 182 181 182 181 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 196
Write 191
Mixed 32.7
SusWrite 180
108% 150 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.6
153% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 108%
Great: 107%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80
264GB free
Firmware: MX6OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 174 169 176 177 175 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
95.7% Outstanding
Read 160
Write 166
Mixed 39.5
SusWrite 173
97% 135 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.8
177% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 95.7%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5702-020.A00G 99P5723-005.A00G 16GB
2666, 2666 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
78.9% Very good
MC Read 32
MC Write 29.4
MC Mixed 23
80% 28.1 GB/s
SC Read 16.3
SC Write 30.2
SC Mixed 23.2
66% 23.2 GB/s
Latency 66.9
60% 66.9 ns
Poor: 77%
This bench: 78.9%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING II Builds (Compare 634 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 102%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 94%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING II

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $529
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $46
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback