Fujitsu LIFEBOOK A555/G

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding HDD
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including moderate gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.04% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive60.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 10 years and 4 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (44%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
Run History
4 months ago, 4 months ago.
SystemFujitsu LIFEBOOK A555/G  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU FJNBB3D
Memory5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20180309
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 05 '19 at 09:40
Run Duration247 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU 44%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i5-5200U
On Board, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
43.2% Average
1-Core 80.3
2-Core 140
53% 110 Pts
4-Core 200
8-Core 201
27% 201 Pts
64-Core 202
14% 202 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 43.2%
Great: 44%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Intel HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)
Fujitsu(10CF 1895) 1GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 18.12.3
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
4.04% Terrible
Lighting 15.8
Reflection 12.4
Parallax 21.4
4% 16.5 fps
MRender 10.1
Gravity 14.9
Splatting 18.1
4% 14.4 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.04%
Great: 5%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Toshiba HG6 256GB
79GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JUFA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 132 113 134 117 117 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
60.6% Good
Read 368
Write 223
Mixed 246
SusWrite 124
53% 240 MB/s
4K Read 19.3
4K Write 68.1
4K Mixed 22
94% 36.5 MB/s
DQ Read 328
DQ Write 127
DQ Mixed 76.5
96% 177 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 60.6%
Great: 111%
SanDisk Ultra Fit 124GB
113GB free, PID 5583
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 24 17 23 28 27 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
25.4% Poor
Read 106
Write 14
Mixed 37
SusWrite 22
47% 44.7 MB/s
4K Read 2.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 2.2
136% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 25.4%
Great: 37%
SanDisk Ultra Fit 124GB
44GB free, PID 5583
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 22 20 24 28 27 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
26% Poor
Read 105
Write 18.9
Mixed 37.5
SusWrite 24.7
50% 46.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 2.3
140% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 26%
Great: 37%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Hynix HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
33% Below average
MC Read 11.4
MC Write 10.9
MC Mixed 9.1
30% 10.5 GB/s
SC Read 10.7
SC Write 11.8
SC Mixed 10.7
32% 11.1 GB/s
Latency 73.3
54% 73.3 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 33%
Great: 33%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical LIFEBOOK A555/G Builds (Compare 51 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: Fujitsu LIFEBOOK A555/G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $148Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $260Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $200AMD RX 590 $180Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $58
Intel Core i7-9700K $350Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $230
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $63SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $613SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback