Asrock Z270M-ITX/ac

Performance Results


Gaming 82% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 91% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 72% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	97.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	287% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock Z270M-ITX/ac (all builds)
Memory	8.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180316
Uptime	7.8 Days
Run Date	Aug 04 '19 at 20:33
Run Duration	261 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	17%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700K-$242 712,312 User benchmarks, average bench 84% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	82.2% Excellent	Memory 82.7 1-Core 129 2-Core 235 84% 149 Pts	4-Core 439 8-Core 682 69% 561 Pts	64-Core 700 43% 700 Pts
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 82.2% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% EVGA(3842 6183) CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 431.60 Performing below potential (21^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	97.3% Outstanding	Lighting 123 Reflection 140 Parallax 116 100% 127 fps	MRender 108 Gravity 124 Splatting 105 91% 112 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 97.3% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$158 331,647 User benchmarks, average bench 297% 444GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1340 1135 1117 1080 1037 1012 MB/s Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)	287% Outstanding	Read 2,306 Write 2,078 Mixed 1,504 SusWrite 1,120 392% 1,752 MB/s	4K Read 57.9 4K Write 142 4K Mixed 79.3 265% 93.2 MB/s	DQ Read 1,034 DQ Write 935 DQ Mixed 1,003 747% 991 MB/s
Poor: 214% ↑ This bench: 287% Great: 372%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 120GB free Firmware: RVT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 457 456 456 454 434 431 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	119% Outstanding	Read 482 Write 449 Mixed 427 SusWrite 448 102% 451 MB/s	4K Read 39.2 4K Write 104 4K Mixed 53.5 183% 65.5 MB/s	DQ Read 375 DQ Write 329 DQ Mixed 346 261% 350 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 119% Great: 133%
Adata Ultimate SU800 512GB-$82 31,280 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 437GB free Firmware: P0801A SusWrite @10s intervals: 445 445 445 447 443 445 MB/s Performing as expected (60^th percentile)	109% Outstanding	Read 490 Write 431 Mixed 391 SusWrite 445 99% 439 MB/s	4K Read 30.5 4K Write 102 4K Mixed 45.7 159% 59.5 MB/s	DQ Read 282 DQ Write 311 DQ Mixed 269 210% 287 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 109% Great: 127%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 3TB 8,194 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 395GB free Firmware: 0.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 88 106 106 101 139 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	68.9% Good	Read 130 Write 128 Mixed 13.5 SusWrite 110 68% 95.3 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.7 148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 68.9% Great: 112%
WD easystore 25FB 8TB 7,734 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 534GB free, PID 25fb Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 166 168 155 131 148 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	68.9% Good	Read 128 Write 140 Mixed 110 SusWrite 156 184% 133 MB/s	4K Read 1.8 4K Write 5.2 4K Mixed 1.1 221% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 68.9% Great: 86%
WD My Book 1140 3TB 6,710 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 335GB free, PID 1140 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 117 116 114 114 117 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	40.8% Average	Read 69.3 Write 76.5 Mixed 68.2 SusWrite 115 116% 82.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.7 87% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 40.8% Great: 59%
WD easystore 25FB 10TB 3,369 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 6.5TB free, PID 25fb Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 194 192 194 192 192 189 MB/s Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	85.6% Excellent	Read 190 Write 195 Mixed 127 SusWrite 192 238% 176 MB/s	4K Read 1.9 4K Write 5.1 4K Mixed 1.2 221% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 85.6% Great: 99%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown DDR4 3000 2OZ 2x8GB 14,178 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (10^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	64% Good	MC Read 25.5 MC Write 22.6 MC Mixed 19.5 64% 22.5 GB/s	SC Read 14.7 SC Write 23.9 SC Mixed 19.7 56% 19.4 GB/s	Latency 75.8 53% 75.8 ns
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 64% Great: 97%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z270M-ITX/ac Builds (Compare 333 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 71%

Battleship

Desktop 89%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 60%

Destroyer

Motherboard: Asrock Z270M-ITX/ac

CPU
Core i7-7700KIntel $242Bench 84%, 712,312 samples	153x
Core i5-7600KIntel $190Bench 76%, 195,006 samples	75x
Core i5-7400Intel $110Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	19x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	53x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	47x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	27x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	14x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	12x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	11x

RAM
DDR4 3000 2OZ 2x8GBUnknownBench 79%, 14,178 samples	33x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	24x
Ripjaws V DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GBG.SKILL $40Bench 71%, 98,777 samples	13x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 101% - Outstanding

Total price: $402

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16