PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 13.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
System | Lenovo 422911G (all builds) |
Motherboard | LENOVO LENOVO |
Memory | 16.9 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20170327 |
Uptime | 0.2 Days |
Run Date | Aug 04 '19 at 14:20 |
Run Duration | 232 Seconds |
Run User | DNK-User |
Background CPU | 0% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2609 0
CPU 0, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz
|
62.6%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia Quadro K4000
Nvidia(10DE 097C) 3GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 1404 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 431.70
|
13.3%
Very poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$40
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 175 172 174 176 175 MB/s
|
95.6%
Outstanding
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$40
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 101 102 101 103 102 MB/s
|
63.4%
Good
|
|||
Seagate ST32000641AS 2TB-$174
1TB free
Firmware: CC13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 120 117 116 120 118 MB/s
|
67.2%
Good
|
|||
Hitachi HDS72302 2TB
773GB free (System drive)
Firmware: A5R0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 76 77 75 88 86 MB/s
|
53%
Above average
|
|||
Seagate ST32000641AS 2TB-$174
991GB free
Firmware: CC13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 109 109 108 111 109 MB/s
|
62.5%
Good
|
|||
Kindle Internal Storage 1GB
1GB free, PID 0004
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.8 3.5 3.4 3.5 3.4 3.5 MB/s
|
3.95%
Terrible
|
|||
Kingston DataTraveler 101 G2 USB 2.0 4GB-$15
4GB free, PID 1642
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.8 4.8 4.9 4.8 4.9 4.9 MB/s
|
5.27%
Terrible
|
|||
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 16GB-$8
8GB free, PID 5581
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 9.6 9.6 9.8 10 10 MB/s
|
8.29%
Terrible
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2609 01stBench 54%, 930 samples | 2x |
Xeon E5-2687W 0Intel $1,335Bench 74%, 868 samples | 1x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 650 Ti BoostNvidia $140Bench 17%, 15,701 samples | 1x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 1x |
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples | 1x |
SSD | |
---|---|
MX200 250GBCrucial $134Bench 95%, 26,364 samples | 1x |
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples | 1x |
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples | 1x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 20% - Very poor | Total price: $274 |