Dell Studio XPS 8100

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.66% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive56.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDell Studio XPS 8100
MotherboardDell Studio XPS 8100  (all builds)
Memory1.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100708
Uptime1.4 Days
Run DateAug 04 '19 at 12:47
Run Duration208 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU 39%

 PC Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 870-$100
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
54.4% Above average
Memory 67.1
1-Core 77.6
2-Core 137
56% 94 Pts
4-Core 229
8-Core 312
34% 271 Pts
64-Core 334
21% 334 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 54.4%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
Gigabyte(1458 36F7) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 430.86
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
3.66% Terrible
Lighting 4.27
Reflection 4.35
Parallax 4.19
4% 4.27 fps
MRender 4.1
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 6.13
4% 4.71 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.66%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130
261GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 206 214 218 216 213 218 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
56.3% Above average
Read 234
Write 222
Mixed 213
SusWrite 214
50% 221 MB/s
4K Read 17.7
4K Write 38.8
4K Mixed 25.5
80% 27.3 MB/s
DQ Read 201
DQ Write 190
DQ Mixed 188
143% 193 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 133%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70
126GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 47 39 60 53 56 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
30.3% Below average
Read 54.7
Write 72.8
Mixed 24.8
SusWrite 51
37% 50.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.3
64% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 30.3%
Great: 67%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$40
5GB free
Firmware: 05.00K05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 70 79 77 71 67 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
42.5% Average
Read 76.5
Write 76.2
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 71.3
53% 71.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
162% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 42.5%
Great: 76%
Asmt ASM1156-PM 4TB
41GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 14 14 14 14 14 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
13.6% Very poor
Read 32.5
Write 28.2
Mixed 27.5
SusWrite 14.1
19% 25.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
150% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 13.6%
Great: 100%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
32GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 55 56 55 63 56 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
29.1% Poor
Read 44.5
Write 46.5
Mixed 32.2
SusWrite 56.5
33% 44.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.5
105% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 29.1%
Great: 59%
Asmt ASM1156-PM 8TB
63GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 14 14 14 14 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
13.6% Very poor
Read 32
Write 28.8
Mixed 29.5
SusWrite 13.9
20% 26.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 3.7
4K Mixed 1.1
249% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 13.6%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KP223C-ELD KP223C-ELD Samsung M378B5273DH0-CH9 8GB
1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
26.3% Poor
MC Read 8
MC Write 9.4
MC Mixed 7.9
24% 8.43 GB/s
SC Read 8.2
SC Write 10.5
SC Mixed 9.7
27% 9.47 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 26.3%
Great: 28%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Studio XPS 8100 Builds (Compare 668 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Dell Studio XPS 8100

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $492
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback