Asus P5N-EM HDMI

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive	28.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus P5N-EM HDMI (all builds)
Memory	0.6 GB free of 3 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100615
Uptime	21.9 Days
Run Date	Aug 04 '19 at 09:36
Run Duration	170 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	18%

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo E8600-$180 6,109 User benchmarks, average bench 44% Socket 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3.35 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	47.6% Average	Memory 84.4 1-Core 35.6 2-Core 63.3 43% 61.1 Pts	4-Core 63.5 8-Core 87.5 10% 75.5 Pts	64-Core 92.5 6% 92.5 Pts
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 47.6% Great: 49%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 171GB free (System drive) Firmware: R0105A SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 104 102 36 36 39 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	28.7% Poor	Read 249 Write 199 Mixed 27.6 SusWrite 69.6 30% 136 MB/s	4K Read 27.6 4K Write 14 4K Mixed 0.8 50% 14.1 MB/s	DQ Read 33.1 DQ Write 17.5 DQ Mixed 25.6 19% 25.4 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 28.7% Great: 100%
Maxtor STM3320820A 320GB 219 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 126GB free Firmware: 3.AAE SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 35 35 35 36 36 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	27.9% Poor	Read 61.8 Write 38.3 Mixed 36.3 SusWrite 35.1 32% 42.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.8 142% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 27.9% Great: 42%
Maxtor 6L040J2 40GB 123 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 16GB free Firmware: A93.0500 SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 35 35 35 36 36 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	20.8% Poor	Read 37.1 Write 36 Mixed 24.9 SusWrite 35.1 24% 33.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.7 118% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 20.8% Great: 22%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 722GB free Firmware: 02.01A02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 104 102 37 37 40 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	69.2% Good	Read 170 Write 140 Mixed 72.2 SusWrite 70 83% 113 MB/s	4K Read 1.5 4K Write 3 4K Mixed 1.2 251% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 69.2% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 3GB 81,553 User benchmarks, average bench 14% null MHz 1024, 2048 MB Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	16.3% Very poor	MC Read 4.3 MC Write 5.3 MC Mixed 3.8 13% 4.47 GB/s	SC Read 4.4 SC Write 4.6 SC Mixed 4.3 13% 4.43 GB/s	Latency 72.8 55% 72.8 ns
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 16.3% Great: 23%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P5N-EM HDMI Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 43%

Speed boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5N-EM HDMI

CPU
Core2 Duo E8500Intel $110Bench 42%, 18,841 samples	1x
Core2 Duo E7400Intel $130Bench 38%, 14,354 samples	1x
Pentium E6800IntelBench 41%, 851 samples	1x

GPU
GeForce GT 430NvidiaBench 3%, 22,369 samples	1x
GTX 650Nvidia $112Bench 8%, 69,673 samples	1x
GeForce 7100 / nForce 630iNvidiaBench 0%, 395 samples	1x

SSD
Mobile 120GB SSDAvantBench 48%, 1 sample	1x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 54% - Above average

Total price: $110

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16