Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 35% Sail boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.46% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	41.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (73%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A4-6210 APU R3 Graphics 5,378 User benchmarks, average bench 30% Socket FT3b, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.75 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	37.4% Below average	Memory 57.6 1-Core 27.2 2-Core 54.9 32% 46.6 Pts	4-Core 101 8-Core 104 14% 103 Pts	64-Core 103 6% 103 Pts
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 37.4% Great: 36%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R3 Graphics 6,021 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Legend(17AA 5046) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1060.0 Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	1.46% Terrible	Lighting 1.4 Reflection 3.88 Parallax 2.34 1% 2.54 fps	MRender 3.05 Gravity 1.53 Splatting 2.91 2% 2.5 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.46% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LF120HCHP-000L1 120GB 3,932 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 65GB free (System drive) Firmware: FXT03L0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 65 62 69 69 66 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	41.3% Average	Read 423 Write 70.2 Mixed 109 SusWrite 65.8 36% 167 MB/s	4K Read 17.5 4K Write 17.1 4K Mixed 13.9 53% 16.2 MB/s	DQ Read 155 DQ Write 27.9 DQ Mixed 38.9 42% 74.1 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 41.3% Great: 60%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B1G73EB0-YK0 1x8GB 39,427 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 1 of 1 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	16.4% Very poor	MC Read 6.7 MC Write 3.4 MC Mixed 5.7 15% 5.27 GB/s	SC Read 4.8 SC Write 3.9 SC Mixed 5.6 14% 4.77 GB/s	Latency 135 30% 135 ns
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 16.4% Great: 33%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 29%

Raft

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
A4-6210 APU R3 GraphicsAMDBench 30%, 5,378 samples	1x

GPU
Radeon R3 GraphicsAMDBench 2%, 6,021 samples	1x

SSD
MZ7LF120HCHP-000L1 120GBSamsungBench 48%, 3,932 samples	1x

RAM
HMT451S6BFR8A-PB 1x4GBHynixBench 25%, 64,960 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16