Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512FA_X512FA

Performance Results


Gaming 10% Tree trunk	Desktop 58% Gunboat	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	4.97% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	33.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 91% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

System	Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512FA_X512FA (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK X512FA
Memory	4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190211
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Aug 03 '19 at 17:57
Run Duration	138 Seconds
Run User	JPN-User
Background CPU	19%
CPU Throttled	91%

PC Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-8145U 15,431 User benchmarks, average bench 53% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	55.5% Above average	Memory 68.4 1-Core 94.9 2-Core 172 64% 112 Pts	4-Core 247 8-Core 252 33% 249 Pts	64-Core 258 16% 258 Pts
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 55.5% Great: 66%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 178,291 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Asus(1043 16F1) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 24.20.100.6292 Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	4.97% Terrible	Lighting 6.77 Reflection 9.77 Parallax 6.38 6% 7.64 fps	MRender 10.5 Gravity 6.07 Splatting 0.09 4% 5.54 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.97% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC WDS120G2G0B-00EPW0 120GB 30,897 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 72GB free (System drive) Firmware: UI500000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 41 16 111 69 68 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	33.2% Below average	Read 361 Write 260 Mixed 158 SusWrite 79 48% 215 MB/s	4K Read 8.4 4K Write 13.8 4K Mixed 8.7 31% 10.3 MB/s	DQ Read 112 DQ Write 82.6 DQ Mixed 42.2 46% 79 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 33.2% Great: 52%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB 179,769 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 926GB free Firmware: JU0C0J SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 122 121 127 127 127 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	78.8% Very good	Read 149 Write 140 Mixed 54 SusWrite 125 85% 117 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 4.7 4K Mixed 0.6 208% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 78.8% Great: 79%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA851S6AFR6N-UH 04EF TEAMGROUP-SD4-2400 8GB 139 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 2400, 2400 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	67.8% Good	MC Read 25 MC Write 26.2 MC Mixed 21.1 69% 24.1 GB/s	SC Read 16.6 SC Write 26.7 SC Mixed 23.6 64% 22.3 GB/s	Latency 105 38% 105 ns
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 67.8% Great: 68%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512FA_X512FA Builds (Compare 291 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 56%

Gunboat

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512FA_X512FA

CPU
Core i5-8265UIntelBench 53%, 87,841 samples	140x
Core i3-8145UIntelBench 53%, 15,431 samples	107x
Core i7-8565UIntelBench 55%, 81,207 samples	35x

GPU
UHD Graphics 620IntelBench 5%, 178,291 samples	282x
UHD Graphics 610IntelBench 2%, 3,878 samples	9x

SSD
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $60Bench 156%, 162,275 samples	77x
RBUSNS8154P3256GJ3 256GBKingstonBench 97%, 7,536 samples	59x
RBUSNS8180DS3256GJ 256GBKingstonBench 58%, 2,813 samples	18x

RAM
M471A5244CB0-CRC Hynix HMA851S6AFR6N-UH 8GBSamsungBench 60%, 4,290 samples	60x
HMA851S6AFR6N-UH 2x4GBHynixBench 57%, 26,973 samples	49x
HMA851S6AFR6N-UH 1x4GBHynixBench 32%, 32,443 samples	39x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 51% - Above average

Total price: $60

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16