PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 53.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 69.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Intel S2600CWR (all builds) |
Memory | 60.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20161228 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Aug 03 '19 at 06:15 |
Run Duration | 197 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 1% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2697 v4
CPU1, 1 CPU, 18 cores, 36 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 1.3 GHz (avg)
|
49.9%
Average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia Quadro M5000
Nvidia(10DE 1152) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1126 MHz, MLim: 1652 MHz, Ram: 7.5GB, Driver: 391.33
|
53.3%
Above average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 EVO M.2 500GB
290GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT21B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 350 317 297 302 302 301 MB/s
|
69.2%
Good
|
|||
Samsung 840 Evo 1TB-$199
113GB free
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 327 358 360 359 358 358 MB/s
|
69.1%
Good
|
|||
Seagate ST4000VX000-1F4168 4TB
389GB free
Firmware: CV11
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 95 95 95 95 95 MB/s
|
64%
Good
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$40
417GB free
Firmware: CC27
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 146 145 146 147 147 MB/s
|
94.2%
Outstanding
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$40
106GB free
Firmware: CC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 102 102 101 100 102 MB/s
|
55.9%
Above average
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79
606GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 94 102 103 105 103 MB/s
|
50.6%
Above average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung M393A2G40EB1-CPB 4x16GB
4 of 16 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 2134 MHz
|
68%
Good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 v41stBench 64%, 1,389 samples | 7x |
Xeon E5-1650 v4IntelBench 83%, 3,842 samples | 6x |
Xeon E5-2630 v3IntelBench 69%, 1,838 samples | 2x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 4x |
GTX 660Nvidia $170Bench 20%, 123,956 samples | 4x |
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 2x |
SSD | |
---|---|
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples | 3x |
860 QVO 1TBSamsung $109Bench 89%, 201,200 samples | 3x |
Raid 0 Volume 7.5TBIntelBench 126%, 21 samples | 2x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 58% - Above average | Total price: $428 |