ECS B85H3-M9

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD, HDD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics0.88% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (46%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
MotherboardECS B85H3-M9  (all builds)
Memory5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140811
Uptime38.3 Days
Run DateAug 02 '19 at 19:57
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User CHL-User
Background CPU 46%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i5-4440-$228
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
54% Above average
1-Core 87.8
2-Core 190
64% 139 Pts
4-Core 272
8-Core 355
41% 313 Pts
64-Core 345
23% 345 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 54%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 210
MSI(1462 8094) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.1
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.88% Terrible
Lighting 3.7
Reflection 6
Parallax 1.5
1% 3.73 fps
MRender 4.2
Gravity 2.6
Splatting 3.4
1% 3.4 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.88%
Great: 1%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$38
148GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF500000
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 406
Write 269
Mixed 313
73% 330 MB/s
4K Read 12
4K Write 28.3
4K Mixed 15.4
53% 18.6 MB/s
DQ Read 119
DQ Write 82.8
DQ Mixed 34.3
44% 78.6 MB/s
Poor: 34% Great: 55%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Crucial CT102464BD160B.M16 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
34% Below average
MC Read 11.2
MC Write 11.7
MC Mixed 9.5
31% 10.8 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 12.1
SC Mixed 10.7
31% 11 GB/s
Latency 68.1
59% 68.1 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 34%
Great: 34%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical B85H3-M9 Builds (Compare 49 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: ECS B85H3-M9

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $462
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $218Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $42
Intel Core i5-9400F $150Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $356Nvidia RTX 2060 $349Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $249
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $63SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $653SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $14
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback