Supermicro H8DG6/H8DGi

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 44% Speed boat	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	6.78% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	34.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Supermicro H8DG6/H8DGi (all builds)
Motherboard	Supermicro H8DG6/H8DGi
Memory	14 GB free of 63.998 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20160318
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 02 '19 at 18:18
Run Duration	146 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Opteron 6386 SE 28 User benchmarks, average bench 54% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	44.6% Average	Memory 57.8 1-Core 49.2 2-Core 94.5 41% 67.2 Pts	4-Core 169 8-Core 321 29% 245 Pts	64-Core 596 37% 596 Pts
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 44.6% Great: 63%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 3870 554 User benchmarks, average bench 6% Asus(1043 024C) 512MB Driver: atidxx32 Ver. 8.56.1.15 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	6.78% Terrible	Lighting 8.1 Reflection 12.2 Parallax 2.41 7% 7.57 fps	MRender 7.43 Gravity 3.53 Splatting 13.3 7% 8.09 fps
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 6.78% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V+200 Series 60GB 127 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 16GB free (System drive) Firmware: 501ABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 59 59 61 59 62 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	34.5% Below average	Read 141 Write 62.3 Mixed 87.4 SusWrite 59.3 20% 87.4 MB/s	4K Read 18.5 4K Write 40.7 4K Mixed 20.7 76% 26.6 MB/s	DQ Read 23.7 DQ Write 57.7 DQ Mixed 28.3 25% 36.6 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 34.5% Great: 80%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB 60,539 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 3GB free, PID 5567 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.5 3.7 4.2 4.2 4.3 4.1 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	8.34% Terrible	Read 18.6 Write 13.1 Mixed 13.1 SusWrite 4 15% 12.2 MB/s	4K Read 3.3 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.9 87% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 8.34% Great: 17%
SanDisk Cruzer Orbit 8GB 439 User benchmarks, average bench 9% 5GB free, PID 557c Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.2 4.3 3.8 4 3.8 3.8 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	10.5% Very poor	Read 27 Write 7.4 Mixed 6.7 SusWrite 4.1 12% 11.3 MB/s	4K Read 3.1 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 2.2 141% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 10.5% Great: 12%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M386B4G70BM0-YK00 M386B4G70DM0-YK03 63GB 1333, 1333 MHz 32767, 32767 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	21% Poor	MC Read 7.6 MC Write 7.5 MC Mixed 6.1 20% 7.07 GB/s	SC Read 5 SC Write 5.5 SC Mixed 7.5 17% 6 GB/s	Latency 134 30% 134 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H8DG6/H8DGi Builds (Compare 24 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 30%

Sail boat

Desktop 59%

Gunboat

Workstation 34%

Sail boat

System: Supermicro H8DG6/H8DGi

CPU
CPU: AMD Opteron 63801stBench 50%, 73 samples	6x
CPU: AMD Opteron 6386 SE1stBench 54%, 93 samples	5x
CPU: AMD Opteron 63481stBench 51%, 21 samples	4x

GPU
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	5x
R9 FuryAMD $199Bench 58%, 18,014 samples	4x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	3x

SSD
CS900 240GBPNY $22Bench 73%, 61,417 samples	4x
Solid State 128GBSpccBench 63%, 64 samples	3x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	2x

RAM
9965426-037.A00LF 8x4GBKingstonBench 57%, 7 samples	6x
9965447-042.A00LF 4x4GBKingstonBench 35%, 5 samples	2x
9965433-091.A00LF 8x8GBKingstonBench 36%, 5 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 85% - Excellent

Total price: $152

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16