Asus Z170-P

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 25%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics25.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive60.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
MotherboardAsus Z170-P  (all builds)
Memory4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180516
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 01 '19 at 20:55
Run Duration205 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i5-6400-$179
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 1.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
26.9% Poor
1-Core 27.2
2-Core 44.5
18% 35.8 Pts
4-Core 192
8-Core 367
34% 279 Pts
64-Core 335
22% 335 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 26.9%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD R9 270X-$199
CLim: 1070 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.12.1
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
25.1% Poor
Lighting 95.4
Reflection 81.2
Parallax 156
25% 111 fps
MRender 62.3
Gravity 93.1
Splatting 87.1
25% 80.8 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 25.1%
Great: 28%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Crucial BX100 250GB-$99
85GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 276 194 264 204 174 184 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
60.3% Good
Read 327
Write 327
Mixed 308
SusWrite 216
66% 294 MB/s
4K Read 18.7
4K Write 35.1
4K Mixed 20.5
73% 24.8 MB/s
DQ Read 260
DQ Write 257
DQ Mixed 191
162% 236 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 60.3%
Great: 104%
WD Green 2TB (2010)-$82
216GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 68 67 67 67 66 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
51.1% Above average
Read 111
Write 91.7
Mixed 53.7
SusWrite 66.8
59% 80.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
153% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 67%
ST1000LM 048-2E7172 1TB
112GB free, PID 102a
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 39 39 40 40 40 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
27% Poor
Read 36.2
Write 37.4
Mixed 28.1
SusWrite 39.4
48% 35.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 4.2
4K Mixed 0.3
157% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 27%
Great: 29%
APPLE HD D HTS545050A7E36 500GB
426GB free, PID 0611
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 0 3.1 0 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Write 24.2
Mixed 6.7
SusWrite 3.3
18% 11.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
28% 0.37 MB/s
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Crucial BLS4G4D240FSB.8FBD 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
57.5% Above average
MC Read 19.6
MC Write 27.1
MC Mixed 22.8
66% 23.2 GB/s
SC Read 6
SC Write 9.4
SC Mixed 8
22% 7.8 GB/s
Latency 181
22% 181 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 57.5%
Great: 97%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical Z170-P Builds (Compare 9,127 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 56%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus Z170-P - $119

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $654
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $150Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $244Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $200AMD RX 590 $180Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $360Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $230
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $58SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $613SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback