PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 33.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 27.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Lenovo 4157GH1 (all builds) |
Motherboard | LENOVO Lenovo |
Memory | 2.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
Display | 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20110523 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Aug 01 '19 at 18:46 |
Run Duration | 129 Seconds |
Run User | ZAF-User |
Background CPU | 27% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon W3550
1366-pin LGA, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.05 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
|
55.8%
Above average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD R9 280X-$500
Asus(1043 0418) 3GB
CLim: 945 MHz, MLim: 1370 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 19.5.2
Performing below potential (42nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
33.8%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$42
33GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF450000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 77 5.4 31 2.2 38 MB/s
|
27.1%
Poor
|
|||
Toshiba MQ01ABF050 500GB-$32
123GB free
Firmware: AM0P1D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 76 76 76 76 77 MB/s
|
42.9%
Average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 6 slots used
8GB DIMM 15h Reserved 1066 MHz
|
28.8%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
GPU | |
---|---|
Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples | 1x |
GTX 750Nvidia $120Bench 15%, 66,662 samples | 1x |
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 1x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER |