PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 27.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 86.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | MSI MS-7820 |
Motherboard | MSI H81-P33(MS-7820) (all builds) |
Memory | 2.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20150330 |
Uptime | 1.9 Days |
Run Date | Aug 01 '19 at 16:19 |
Run Duration | 154 Seconds |
Run User | DEU-User |
Background CPU | 28% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
58.6%
Above average
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 430.86
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
27.4%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 750 EVO 250GB-$42
91GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 230 89 70 75 69 74 MB/s
|
86.6%
Excellent
|
|||
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
143GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 186 205 214 227 224 229 MB/s
|
72.1%
Very good
|
|||
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$109
676GB free
Firmware: RVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 323 362 375 412 406 421 MB/s
|
100%
Outstanding
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial CT51264BA160B.C16F 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
|
48.3%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples | 16x |
Core i5-4590Intel $188Bench 63%, 151,366 samples | 11x |
Core i3-4160Intel $79Bench 55%, 48,506 samples | 10x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 10x |
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 7x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 7x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 80% - Very good | Total price: $349 |