Asus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics4.3% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive251% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180824
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 01 '19 at 04:32
Run Duration211 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700-$185
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
79.4% Very good
Memory 78.7
1-Core 125
2-Core 242
82% 149 Pts
4-Core 430
8-Core 838
75% 634 Pts
64-Core 1,156
72% 1,156 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 79.4%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 240
XFX(1682 7240) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 4GB, Driver: 18.3.1
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
4.3% Terrible
Lighting 5.13
Reflection 6.73
Parallax 6.78
4% 6.22 fps
MRender 4.67
Gravity 5.27
Splatting 6.26
4% 5.4 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.3%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$46
170GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1363 401 403 406 406 408 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
251% Outstanding
Read 2,547
Write 2,232
Mixed 1,520
SusWrite 565
382% 1,716 MB/s
4K Read 57.1
4K Write 136
4K Mixed 76.8
257% 89.9 MB/s
DQ Read 920
DQ Write 627
DQ Mixed 874
625% 807 MB/s
Poor: 152%
This bench: 251%
Great: 302%
Samsung 860 QVO 2TB-$200
1TB free
Firmware: RVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 493 494 494 494 494 494 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
121% Outstanding
Read 499
Write 477
Mixed 401
SusWrite 494
106% 468 MB/s
4K Read 34.7
4K Write 105
4K Mixed 50.5
173% 63.5 MB/s
DQ Read 387
DQ Write 361
DQ Mixed 368
278% 372 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 121%
Great: 122%
Crucial BX500 960GB-$54
681GB free
Firmware: M6CR022
SusWrite @10s intervals: 464 462 463 463 463 465 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 500
Write 453
Mixed 410
SusWrite 463
103% 457 MB/s
4K Read 30.4
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 28.8
136% 53.5 MB/s
DQ Read 193
DQ Write 347
DQ Mixed 39
95% 193 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 101%
Great: 91%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G4D32AESBK.M8FE 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
87.5% Excellent
MC Read 33.9
MC Write 32
MC Mixed 28.9
90% 31.6 GB/s
SC Read 22.1
SC Write 31.9
SC Mixed 26
76% 26.7 GB/s
Latency 83
48% 83 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 87.5%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,012 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $474
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback