Asus Z170M-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics23.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive98.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus Z170M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory8.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit väriä
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170710
Uptime20.3 Days
Run DateJul 31 '19 at 17:25
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU 34%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6600K-$81
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
66.1% Good
Memory 84.5
1-Core 105
2-Core 202
75% 130 Pts
4-Core 279
8-Core 276
37% 278 Pts
64-Core 320
20% 320 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 66.1%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1490 MHz, MLim: 1781 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 430.86
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
23.6% Poor
Lighting 26.7
Reflection 30.8
Parallax 25
22% 27.5 fps
MRender 38.1
Gravity 26.7
Splatting 34.8
27% 33.2 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 23.6%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
225GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 333 371 270 271 269 270 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
98.1% Outstanding
Read 444
Write 415
Mixed 376
SusWrite 298
86% 383 MB/s
4K Read 33.4
4K Write 83.6
4K Mixed 45.3
153% 54.1 MB/s
DQ Read 375
DQ Write 278
DQ Mixed 315
239% 323 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 98.1%
Great: 134%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.10 320GB-$80
39GB free
Firmware: 3.AAK
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 77 77 78 78 78 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
40.4% Average
Read 63.8
Write 65
Mixed 41.5
SusWrite 76.7
45% 61.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
126% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 40.4%
Great: 43%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.10 320GB-$80
43GB free
Firmware: 3.AAK
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 51 51 51 51 51 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
28.8% Poor
Read 49.3
Write 31.2
Mixed 34.5
SusWrite 50.6
31% 41.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
134% 1 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 28.8%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3000 C15 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
69.4% Good
MC Read 24.1
MC Write 27.1
MC Mixed 23.4
71% 24.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.5
SC Write 26.5
SC Mixed 17.3
56% 19.4 GB/s
Latency 72.7
55% 72.7 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 69.4%
Great: 117%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z170M-PLUS Builds (Compare 1,230 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus Z170M-PLUS - $87

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $536
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback