Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 8% Tree trunk	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.21% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	The RAM on this system should be upgraded to at least 2GB although on 32bit systems 1GB will suffice as a bare minimum.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo T7300-$90 2,712 User benchmarks, average bench 34% Microprocessor, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2 GHz Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	38.3% Below average	Memory 69.4 1-Core 24.1 2-Core 45.4 34% 46.3 Pts	4-Core 44.9 8-Core 45 6% 45 Pts	64-Core 45.7 3% 45.7 Pts
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 38.3% Great: 39%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro NVS 135M 34 User benchmarks, average bench 0% Dell(1028 01F9) 128MB Ram: 128MB, Driver: 341.61 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	0.21% Terrible	Lighting 0.27 Reflection 0.12 Parallax 0.03 0% 0.14 fps	MRender 0.29 Gravity 0.23 Splatting 0.22 0% 0.25 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.21% Great: 0%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Seagate ST320LM001 HN-M320MBB 320GB 6,367 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 196GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2AR10001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 30 44 16 13 5 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	18.3% Very poor	Read 43.5 Write 43.5 Mixed 28.3 SusWrite 20.1 25% 33.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0 23% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 18.3% Great: 51%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1GB 4,189 User benchmarks, average bench 13% null MHz 1024, 512 MB Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	13.7% Very poor	MC Read 4.7 MC Write 3.5 MC Mixed 3.6 11% 3.93 GB/s	SC Read 4 SC Write 3.8 SC Mixed 4 11% 3.93 GB/s	Latency 103 39% 103 ns
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 13.7% Great: 43%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 33%

Sail boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core2 Duo T7250Intel $97Bench 34%, 3,604 samples	16x
Core2 Duo T7500Intel $90Bench 35%, 4,281 samples	14x
Core2 Duo T7100Intel $99Bench 33%, 1,343 samples	6x

GPU
Intel 965 Express Chipset FamilyMobileBench 0%, 3,066 samples	33x
Quadro NVS 135MNvidiaBench 0%, 34 samples	15x

SSD
SSD Pro 1500 Series 180GBIntel $209Bench 69%, 7,834 samples	1x
X25-M 80GBIntelBench 34%, 12,660 samples	1x
840 Evo 250GBSamsung $95Bench 96%, 217,115 samples	1x

Value: 17% - Very poor

Total price: $306

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16