Asus PRIME X470-PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 109%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 111%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics107% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive235% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus PRIME X470-PRO  (all builds)
Memory11 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190529
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 31 '19 at 08:16
Run Duration184 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$205
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
99.5% Outstanding
Memory 87.4
1-Core 152
2-Core 303
98% 181 Pts
4-Core 597
8-Core 1,174
105% 886 Pts
64-Core 1,453
90% 1,453 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 99.5%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400
Asus(1043 8593) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2062 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 431.60
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Lighting 139
Reflection 151
Parallax 128
113% 139 fps
MRender 117
Gravity 138
Splatting 114
100% 123 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 107%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB (2019)-$46
177GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 102000WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 588 431 432 431 432 432 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
235% Outstanding
Read 1,796
Write 1,516
Mixed 1363
SusWrite 458
286% 1,283 MB/s
4K Read 51.6
4K Write 218
4K Mixed 79.5
295% 116 MB/s
DQ Read 850
DQ Write 1,149
DQ Mixed 804
662% 934 MB/s
Poor: 143%
This bench: 235%
Great: 238%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
91GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 8,442
Write 7,555
Mixed 7,806
1,771% 7,935 MB/s
4K Read 820
4K Write 415
4K Mixed 477
2,073% 571 MB/s
DQ Read 2,034
DQ Write 1582
DQ Mixed 1,642
1,273% 1,753 MB/s
Poor: 80% Great: 134%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 2TB (2016)-$79
226GB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 119 118 116 118 118 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
60.2% Good
Read 91
Write 86
Mixed 28.5
SusWrite 117
58% 80.7 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 1.9
349% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 60.2%
Great: 110%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
416GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 163 164 165 164 163 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
87.9% Excellent
Read 143
Write 136
Mixed 79.5
SusWrite 163
96% 131 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.2
230% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 87.9%
Great: 109%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29
53GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 69 69 69 69 70 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
38.9% Below average
Read 65.7
Write 65.8
Mixed 53.3
SusWrite 69.2
47% 63.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.9
177% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 38.9%
Great: 69%
Corsair Voyager GO 124GB
8GB free, PID 1a0f
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 29 34 34 33 26 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
26.1% Poor
Read 92.5
Write 52.5
Mixed 39
SusWrite 28.2
63% 53 MB/s
4K Read 9.3
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 2.3
160% 4.33 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 26.1%
Great: 30%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
84.2% Excellent
MC Read 31.7
MC Write 23.9
MC Mixed 33.2
85% 29.6 GB/s
SC Read 26.5
SC Write 21.9
SC Mixed 35.1
80% 27.8 GB/s
Latency 70.1
57% 70.1 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 84.2%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME X470-PRO Builds (Compare 5,560 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X470-PRO - $139

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 107% - Outstanding Total price: $635
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback