MSI Z170A GAMING M7 (MS-7976)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 109%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 100%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 92%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (88th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 12 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics106% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive111% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7976
MotherboardMSI Z170A GAMING M7 (MS-7976)  (all builds)
Memory13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160722
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 30 '19 at 19:49
Run Duration173 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 32%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$180
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
99.4% Outstanding
Memory 97.1
1-Core 140
2-Core 281
96% 173 Pts
4-Core 551
8-Core 770
83% 660 Pts
64-Core 770
48% 770 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 99.4%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 431.36
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Lighting 138
Reflection 148
Parallax 126
113% 137 fps
MRender 115
Gravity 136
Splatting 109
98% 120 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 106%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ Vertex 4 256GB-$400
116GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 352 341 395 387 377 385 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 477
Write 402
Mixed 282
SusWrite 373
86% 384 MB/s
4K Read 35.3
4K Write 141
4K Mixed 40.2
179% 72 MB/s
DQ Read 341
DQ Write 320
DQ Mixed 318
242% 326 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 111%
Great: 106%
OCZ Vertex 3 MAX IOPS 120GB-$106
49GB free
Firmware: 2.25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 192 198 197 192 196 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
92.3% Outstanding
Read 432
Write 218
Mixed 262
SusWrite 185
61% 275 MB/s
4K Read 35.3
4K Write 126
4K Mixed 43.1
176% 68.3 MB/s
DQ Read 289
DQ Write 173
DQ Mixed 137
127% 200 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 92.3%
Great: 88%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130
135GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 385 396 459 489 491 469 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
133% Outstanding
Read 510
Write 493
Mixed 464
SusWrite 448
108% 479 MB/s
4K Read 45.3
4K Write 132
4K Mixed 65.6
223% 81 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 346
DQ Mixed 350
267% 360 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 133%
Great: 133%
Seagate ST3250820AS 250GB-$60
147GB free
Firmware: 3.AAE
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 64 64 64 64 64 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
35.9% Below average
Read 60.7
Write 26.2
Mixed 37.2
SusWrite 64.1
35% 47.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
129% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 35.9%
Great: 44%
Seagate ST3250820AS 250GB-$60
229GB free
Firmware: 3.AAE
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 57 57 57 57 57 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
39.6% Below average
Read 81
Write 42
Mixed 43.2
SusWrite 56.7
41% 55.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
142% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 39.6%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$57
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
106% Outstanding
MC Read 37.7
MC Write 41.9
MC Mixed 32.2
106% 37.3 GB/s
SC Read 23.1
SC Write 45.4
SC Mixed 31.9
96% 33.5 GB/s
Latency 49.9
80% 49.9 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 106%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z170A GAMING M7 (MS-7976) Builds (Compare 2,479 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship

Motherboard: MSI Z170A GAMING M7 (MS-7976) - $180

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $912
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback