Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5

Performance Results


Gaming 67% Battle cruiser	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 76% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	110% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	228% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5 (all builds)
Memory	11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190712
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 30 '19 at 18:30
Run Duration	190 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	33%

Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$205 635,419 User benchmarks, average bench 86% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	57.8% Above average	Memory 72.5 1-Core 57.4 2-Core 138 53% 89.3 Pts	4-Core 233 8-Core 557 45% 395 Pts	64-Core 1,438 89% 1,438 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 57.8% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441 357,946 User benchmarks, average bench 156% Gainward(10B0 1E07) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 431.36 Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	110% Outstanding	Lighting 109 Reflection 152 Parallax 230 89% 164 fps	MRender 249 Gravity 209 Splatting 143 158% 200 fps
Poor: 128% ↑ This bench: 110% Great: 174%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$139 63,520 User benchmarks, average bench 266% 358GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B6QCXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1153 1257 1582 1522 1405 1360 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	228% Outstanding	Read 1,818 Write 1,420 Mixed 750 SusWrite 1,380 300% 1,342 MB/s	4K Read 34.2 4K Write 73.8 4K Mixed 42.4 145% 50.1 MB/s	DQ Read 670 DQ Write 527 DQ Mixed 594 446% 597 MB/s
Poor: 159% ↑ This bench: 228% Great: 353%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 67GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 349 395 448 420 263 206 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	90.1% Outstanding	Read 410 Write 410 Mixed 362 SusWrite 347 86% 382 MB/s	4K Read 30.3 4K Write 56.5 4K Mixed 36 122% 40.9 MB/s	DQ Read 338 DQ Write 320 DQ Mixed 332 249% 330 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 90.1% Great: 134%
Intel 530 Series 120GB-$79 15,015 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 70GB free Firmware: DC22 SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 119 127 132 130 125 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	56.3% Above average	Read 360 Write 126 Mixed 182 SusWrite 125 44% 198 MB/s	4K Read 22.5 4K Write 47.8 4K Mixed 25.8 92% 32 MB/s	DQ Read 147 DQ Write 109 DQ Mixed 90.7 78% 116 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 56.3% Great: 79%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 899GB free Firmware: RVT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 335 381 437 430 401 390 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	92.4% Outstanding	Read 444 Write 395 Mixed 372 SusWrite 396 90% 402 MB/s	4K Read 25.9 4K Write 58.5 4K Mixed 37.8 119% 40.7 MB/s	DQ Read 348 DQ Write 245 DQ Mixed 246 198% 280 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 92.4% Great: 133%
Imation Swivel 4GB 16 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 4GB free, PID 0549 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.8 5.2 6.4 6.4 6.3 6.4 MB/s Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	5.46% Terrible	Read 19.2 Write 6.5 Mixed 8.3 SusWrite 5.9 12% 9.98 MB/s	4K Read 5.9 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0.1 25% 2 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 5.46% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C15 2x8GB 111 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	60.5% Good	MC Read 22.7 MC Write 19.9 MC Mixed 20.6 60% 21.1 GB/s	SC Read 21 SC Write 20.6 SC Mixed 21 60% 20.9 GB/s	Latency 95.8 42% 95.8 ns
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 60.5% Great: 121%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-AX370-Gaming 5 Builds (Compare 678 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 90%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 80%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 87%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5 - $246

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	100x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	88x
Ryzen 7 1800XAMD $60Bench 72%, 30,050 samples	75x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	70x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	52x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	49x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	27x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	23x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	17x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	37x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	23x
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GBG.SKILL $73Bench 98%, 54,616 samples	13x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 76% - Very good

Total price: $1,061

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5 - $246

Feedback

PC Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)