Asus ROG STRIX Z390-F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 107%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics101% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive245% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX Z390-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory27.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181019
Uptime2.7 Days
Run DateJul 29 '19 at 17:38
Run Duration188 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i7-9700K-$315
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Memory 96
1-Core 151
2-Core 292
102% 180 Pts
4-Core 575
8-Core 1,110
104% 842 Pts
64-Core 1,114
75% 1,114 Pts
Poor: 86%
This bench: 102%
Great: 106%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$540
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 431.60
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
101% Outstanding
Lighting 333
Reflection 313
Parallax 308
88% 318 fps
MRender 232
Gravity 383
Splatting 240
102% 285 fps
Poor: 92%
This bench: 101%
Great: 114%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$83
103GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 581 301 293 291 293 287 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
245% Outstanding
Read 2,262
Write 1,474
Mixed 1,115
SusWrite 341
287% 1,298 MB/s
4K Read 56.9
4K Write 140
4K Mixed 76
258% 91.1 MB/s
DQ Read 974
DQ Write 1,447
DQ Mixed 1,002
816% 1,141 MB/s
Poor: 153%
This bench: 245%
Great: 274%
Sandisk PLUS 120 GB 120GB
25GB free
Firmware: UE3000RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 73 86 86 80 71 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
49.7% Average
Read 428
Write 291
Mixed 271
SusWrite 78.7
59% 267 MB/s
4K Read 23.8
4K Write 41
4K Mixed 17.3
80% 27.4 MB/s
DQ Read 117
DQ Write 54.5
DQ Mixed 26
35% 66 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 49.7%
Great: 54%
Gigabyte SSD 240GB-$52
82GB free
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 289 184 66 66 68 68 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
81.4% Excellent
Read 473
Write 342
Mixed 320
SusWrite 124
70% 315 MB/s
4K Read 34.1
4K Write 97.3
4K Mixed 31.9
144% 54.4 MB/s
DQ Read 209
DQ Write 315
DQ Mixed 170
154% 231 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 81.4%
Great: 92%
WD Green 500GB (2009)-$64
197GB free
Firmware: 01.00A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 81 82 82 82 83 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
48.3% Average
Read 86.5
Write 83.5
Mixed 53.5
SusWrite 81.8
56% 76.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.5
99% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 54%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$37
847GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 194 194 193 197 193 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 194
Write 84.5
Mixed 74
SusWrite 192
99% 136 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 1 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 111%
Great: 112%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA662 500GB
186GB free
Firmware: JP2OA41A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 105 105 105 105 105 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
60.7% Good
Read 107
Write 98
Mixed 56.2
SusWrite 105
67% 91.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
146% 1 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 60.7%
Great: 77%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Samsung M378A2K43BB1-CRC 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3100 MHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
104% Outstanding
MC Read 39.3
MC Write 40.3
MC Mixed 31.4
106% 37 GB/s
SC Read 22.2
SC Write 42.4
SC Mixed 29.9
90% 31.5 GB/s
Latency 54
74% 54 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 104%
Great: 117%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical ROG STRIX Z390-F GAMING Builds (Compare 7,851 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 112%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 106%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX Z390-F GAMING - $250

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $1,253
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $195Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $46
Intel Core i5-9400F $153Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $315Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $510Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $47
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $60SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $69SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $681SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback