Asrock X570 Steel Legend

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 115%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 112%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics116% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive277% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (41%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock X570 Steel Legend  (all builds)
Memory26.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190614
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 29 '19 at 16:08
Run Duration243 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 41%
Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 3700X How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X-$295
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
96.9% Outstanding
Memory 83.3
1-Core 151
2-Core 301
96% 178 Pts
4-Core 593
8-Core 974
96% 784 Pts
64-Core 1,377
85% 1,377 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 96.9%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 431.60
Performing below potential (55th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
116% Outstanding
Lighting 153
Reflection 150
Parallax 144
124% 149 fps
MRender 176
Gravity 133
Splatting 106
110% 138 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 116%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
416GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1937 1026 822 828 832 830 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
277% Outstanding
Read 2,394
Write 2,339
Mixed 1,785
SusWrite 1,046
424% 1,891 MB/s
4K Read 54.3
4K Write 89.8
4K Mixed 65.3
214% 69.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,250
DQ Write 1,067
DQ Mixed 1,171
874% 1,163 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 277%
Great: 355%
HFS256G39TND-N210A 256GB
238GB free
Firmware: 30001P10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 250 248 251 251 249 250 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
73.9% Very good
Read 455
Write 248
Mixed 220
SusWrite 250
65% 293 MB/s
4K Read 27
4K Write 60.6
4K Mixed 25
105% 37.5 MB/s
DQ Read 208
DQ Write 182
DQ Mixed 168
134% 186 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 83%
Samsung 750 EVO 250GB-$55
233GB free
Firmware: MAT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 387 223 225 228 227 227 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
89.6% Excellent
Read 484
Write 390
Mixed 329
SusWrite 253
81% 364 MB/s
4K Read 34.1
4K Write 63.8
4K Mixed 46.2
145% 48 MB/s
DQ Read 224
DQ Write 192
DQ Mixed 212
158% 209 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 89.6%
Great: 114%
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$38
112GB free
Firmware: 603ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 79 95 78 97 92 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
53.1% Above average
Read 252
Write 120
Mixed 180
SusWrite 86.2
36% 160 MB/s
4K Read 23.3
4K Write 61.8
4K Mixed 30.3
107% 38.5 MB/s
DQ Read 86.9
DQ Write 120
DQ Mixed 90.2
72% 99.1 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 53.1%
Great: 73%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2016)-$114
3TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 162 152 157 147 148 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
87.8% Excellent
Read 152
Write 173
Mixed 65.5
SusWrite 155
99% 136 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
129% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 87.8%
Great: 105%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
90.9% Outstanding
MC Read 37.3
MC Write 23.8
MC Mixed 37.2
94% 32.8 GB/s
SC Read 24.9
SC Write 23.4
SC Mixed 33.9
78% 27.4 GB/s
Latency 74.7
54% 74.7 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 90.9%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X570 Steel Legend Builds (Compare 1,481 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 159%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 161%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X570 Steel Legend

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $990
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback