| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
| Graphics | 141% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
| Boot Drive | 89.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus TUF H310M-PLUS GAMING (all builds) |
| Memory | 11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20180301 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jul 29 '19 at 13:31 |
| Run Duration | 131 Seconds |
| Run User | GBR-User |
| Background CPU | 15% |
PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
85%
Excellent
|
79% 136 Pts
|
67% 543 Pts
|
55% 884 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 431.60
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
141%
Outstanding
|
147% 225 fps
|
159% 203 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
137GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 270 252 253 251 252 245 MB/s
|
89.6%
Excellent
|
75% 336 MB/s
|
131% 48.1 MB/s
|
200% 297 MB/s
|
|
Crucial M4 128GB-$116
118GB free
Firmware: 070H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 193 180 191 193 193 MB/s
|
66.8%
Good
|
56% 253 MB/s
|
99% 39.2 MB/s
|
74% 158 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
70.9%
Very good
|
71% 24.7 GB/s
|
63% 22 GB/s
|
62% 64.4 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical TUF H310M-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 808 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus TUF H310M-PLUS GAMING
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples | 191x |
| Core i5-8400Intel $131Bench 82%, 312,220 samples | 180x |
| Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples | 127x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 78x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 64x |
| RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples | 61x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 119% - Outstanding | Total price: $260 |