TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

MSI X470 GAMING PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 87%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 87%
Aircraft carrier
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics93.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive103% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B79
MotherboardMSI X470 GAMING PLUS  (all builds)
Memory13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181116
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 29 '19 at 05:46
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (84th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$210
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
88.3% Excellent
Memory 83.9
1-Core 125
2-Core 244
84% 151 Pts
4-Core 497
8-Core 919
85% 708 Pts
64-Core 1,324
82% 1,324 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑
This bench: 88.3%
 Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega-64-$400
AMD(1002 0B36) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1630 MHz, MLim: 1020 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.7.2
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
93.6% Outstanding
Lighting 114
Reflection 92.3
Parallax 164
93% 123 fps
MRender 90.1
Gravity 124
Splatting 128
95% 114 fps
Poor: 77% ↑
This bench: 93.6%
 Great: 94%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
302GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 320 320 319 308 308 308 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 488
Write 322
Mixed 316
SusWrite 314
80% 360 MB/s
4K Read 33.1
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 39.9
160% 61 MB/s
DQ Read 375
DQ Write 324
DQ Mixed 254
216% 317 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑
This bench: 103%
 Great: 129%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$66
890GB free
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 463 460 457 458 458 458 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
120% Outstanding
Read 498
Write 455
Mixed 428
SusWrite 459
104% 460 MB/s
4K Read 33.5
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 55.4
178% 64.9 MB/s
DQ Read 388
DQ Write 360
DQ Mixed 309
250% 352 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑
This bench: 120%
 Great: 125%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$33
672GB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 188 191 190 193 188 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 187
Write 184
Mixed 81.7
SusWrite 190
117% 161 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑
This bench: 108%
 Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G4D30BESBK.8FD 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
108% Outstanding
MC Read 44.3
MC Write 39
MC Mixed 34.1
112% 39.1 GB/s
SC Read 26.5
SC Write 40.9
SC Mixed 31.1
94% 32.8 GB/s
Latency 73.6
54% 73.6 ns
Poor: 53% ↑
This bench: 108%
 Great: 107%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical X470 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B79) Builds (Compare 4,486 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat

Motherboard: MSI X470 GAMING PLUS - $239

CPU
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD  $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples1,175x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD  $125Bench 73%, 179,588 samples748x
Ryzen 5 2600XAMD  $120Bench 74%, 142,983 samples643x
GPU
RX 580AMD  $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples323x
RTX 2070Nvidia  $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples282x
RTX 2060Nvidia  $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples225x
SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung  $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples207x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung  $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples147x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung  $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples134x
RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair  $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples357x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair  $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples204x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL  $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples167x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 83% - Excellent Total price: $702
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback