Asus H81M-E

Performance Results


Gaming 12% Tree trunk	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	7.53% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	88.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus H81M-E (all builds)
Memory	4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150618
Uptime	3.8 Days
Run Date	Jul 29 '19 at 00:10
Run Duration	147 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4590-$188 151,366 User benchmarks, average bench 63% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	81.8% Excellent	Memory 94.3 1-Core 102 2-Core 212 79% 136 Pts	4-Core 402 8-Core 400 54% 401 Pts	64-Core 408 25% 408 Pts
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 81.8% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R7 250E 10,952 User benchmarks, average bench 8% Sapphire(174B A001) ≥ 4GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.300.1025.1001 Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	7.53% Terrible	Lighting 9.3 Reflection 12.4 Parallax 13.4 8% 11.7 fps	MRender 7.33 Gravity 9.03 Splatting 10.3 7% 8.89 fps
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 7.53% Great: 10%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 160GB free Firmware: EMT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 400 309 309 309 289 298 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	119% Outstanding	Read 456 Write 444 Mixed 387 SusWrite 319 90% 402 MB/s	4K Read 44.6 4K Write 117 4K Mixed 61.4 208% 74.5 MB/s	DQ Read 381 DQ Write 347 DQ Mixed 361 272% 363 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 119% Great: 124%
Spcc Solid State Diss 240GB 112 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 62GB free (System drive) Firmware: SAFM01.5 SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 260 227 280 164 154 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	88.6% Excellent	Read 460 Write 383 Mixed 286 SusWrite 205 74% 333 MB/s	4K Read 27.5 4K Write 101 4K Mixed 34.6 139% 54.3 MB/s	DQ Read 335 DQ Write 352 DQ Mixed 66.9 127% 251 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 88.6% Great: 95%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$63 235,501 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 1.5TB free Firmware: CC25 SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 110 111 110 111 111 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	90.9% Outstanding	Read 207 Write 174 Mixed 85.6 SusWrite 110 105% 144 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.8 157% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 90.9% Great: 113%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LP DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB 27,024 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	59.7% Above average	MC Read 21.3 MC Write 21.5 MC Mixed 18.2 58% 20.3 GB/s	SC Read 16.6 SC Write 20.4 SC Mixed 18.2 53% 18.4 GB/s	Latency 59.1 68% 59.1 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 59.7% Great: 63%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H81M-E Builds (Compare 1,813 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Destroyer

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H81M-E - $311

CPU
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples	222x
Core i5-4570Intel $99Bench 62%, 129,272 samples	175x
Core i5-4440Intel $128Bench 61%, 81,111 samples	143x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	207x
HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 64,721 samples	108x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	100x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	95x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	43x
A400 120GBKingston $32Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	42x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	38x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	28x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	25x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $548

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $131	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16