| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Graphics | 20.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| Motherboard | Asus P5K-E (all builds) |
| Memory | 4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20090619 |
| Uptime | 10.5 Days |
| Run Date | Jul 28 '19 at 19:16 |
| Run Duration | 150 Seconds |
| Run User | GBR-User |
| Background CPU | 9% |
PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core2 Quad Q6600-$100
LGA775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
|
42.1%
Average
|
35% 49.9 Pts
|
13% 98.2 Pts
|
7% 107 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 480-$500
Nvidia(10DE 075F) 1.5GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 924 MHz, Ram: 1.5GB, Driver: 391.35
|
20.6%
Poor
|
19% 28.6 fps
|
23% 28.5 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
781GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 79 87 84 104 108 MB/s
|
56.3%
Above average
|
67% 91.4 MB/s
|
161% 1.1 MB/s
| |
|
Seagate Expansion 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0710
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 18 18 18 18 19 MB/s
|
13.6%
Very poor
|
19% 25.8 MB/s
|
182% 1.73 MB/s
| |
|
Mass Storage Device 1TB
911GB free, PID 6116
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 16 16 16 16 15 MB/s
|
15%
Very poor
|
30% 23.4 MB/s
|
108% 1.23 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
16.2%
Very poor
|
14% 5.07 GB/s
|
12% 4.23 GB/s
|
37% 109 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical P5K-E Builds (Compare 183 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus P5K-E
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples | 55x |
| Core2 Duo E8400Intel $89Bench 40%, 68,540 samples | 17x |
| Core2 Quad Q9650Intel $170Bench 51%, 16,719 samples | 15x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples | 10x |
| GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 9x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 8x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 43% - Average | Total price: $180 |