Performance Results


Gaming 70% Battleship	Desktop 81% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 81% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	90.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	113% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Micro-Star MS-7B05
Motherboard	MSI X299 TOMAHAWK ARCTIC (MS-7B05) (all builds)
Memory	56.4 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180129
Uptime	3.9 Days
Run Date	Jul 27 '19 at 23:07
Run Duration	122 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	12%

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-7920X-$250 5,430 User benchmarks, average bench 82% CPU0, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	76.8% Very good	Memory 73.3 1-Core 120 2-Core 234 78% 142 Pts	4-Core 430 8-Core 888 77% 659 Pts	64-Core 1,880 116% 1,880 Pts
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 76.8% Great: 91%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% MSI(1462 3367) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 430.86 Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	90.3% Outstanding	Lighting 116 Reflection 125 Parallax 121 94% 121 fps	MRender 99.1 Gravity 113 Splatting 92.4 82% 101 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 90.3% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52 296,814 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 120GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 329 303 300 303 301 299 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	113% Outstanding	Read 489 Write 476 Mixed 449 SusWrite 306 97% 430 MB/s	4K Read 45 4K Write 116 4K Mixed 58.9 205% 73.3 MB/s	DQ Read 191 DQ Write 325 DQ Mixed 250 192% 256 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 113% Great: 128%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$50 344,862 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 2TB free Firmware: MX4OABB0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 196 191 196 197 191 197 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	112% Outstanding	Read 195 Write 190 Mixed 23.3 SusWrite 195 108% 151 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 0.7 170% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 112% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x16GB 9,153 User benchmarks, average bench 98% 4 of 8 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	50% Average	MC Read 14.9 MC Write 24.1 MC Mixed 14.5 51% 17.8 GB/s	SC Read 9.4 SC Write 21.3 SC Mixed 11 40% 13.9 GB/s	Latency 94 43% 94 ns
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 50% Great: 140%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 98%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 92%

Nuclear submarine

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	9x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	6x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	5x

Value: 70% - Very good

Total price: $744

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16