PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 26.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 50.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asrock FM2A88M Extreme4+ (all builds) |
Memory | 3.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20140731 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Jul 27 '19 at 18:39 |
Run Duration | 312 Seconds |
Run User | DEU-User |
Background CPU | 18% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
57.1%
Above average
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
26.2%
Poor
|
||||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
INTENSO 256GB
82GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S8FM
SusWrite @10s intervals: 234 277 206 4.3 23 4.4 MB/s
|
50.3%
Above average
|
|||
Sandisk PLUS 1000GB
668GB free
Firmware: UH51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 190 39 31 21 64 40 MB/s
|
39.9%
Below average
|
|||
60%
Above average
|
||||
Hitachi HDT721064SLA360 640GB-$135
181GB free
Firmware: STDO
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 80 81 80 81 81 MB/s
|
45.3%
Average
|
|||
Seagate Expansion+ Desk 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 9401
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 31 32 33 33 33 MB/s
|
18.5%
Very poor
|
|||
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$9
25GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.7 7.8 9.6 9.6 6.7 MB/s
|
7.73%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
G.SKILL TridentX DDR3 2400 C10 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
32%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
A10-7850K APU (2014 D.Ka)AMD $135Bench 45%, 19,875 samples | 19x |
Athlon II X4 860KAMD $51Bench 45%, 29,887 samples | 11x |
A8-6600K APUAMD $88Bench 50%, 21,890 samples | 8x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 650Nvidia $112Bench 8%, 69,673 samples | 8x |
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 6%, 25,284 samples | 8x |
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 5x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 41% - Average | Total price: $375 |